Store
Subscribe
Fov's

VedExcellence wrote

CraftyGoesMooooo wrote...

wtf
30 fov is actually really good for me, you just need to get used to it
 0
PM Link
QUACK POR
 0
PM Link

Hurdling wrote

wait, how can you play more than 109 because 109 is more than quake fsr.
@onerestrictionn is that 1.8?


No it's still 1.7 you can change it in your .minecraft folder search a video about it
 0
PM Link

Cnnor wrote

Hurdling wrote...



No it's still 1.7 you can change it in your .minecraft folder search a video about it

ohh the options notepad file? ive been in there
 0
PM Link

Hurdling wrote

Cnnor wrote...


ohh the options notepad file? ive been in there


Good for you!
 0
PM Link

JAMCM99 wrote

Contentions wrote...



I cant help that the fact that you seem to know nothing.
HAHAHAHAHAHA NOBODY WHO'S ACTUALLY GOOD USE >95
 0
PM Link

Contentions wrote

JAMCM99 wrote...

HAHAHAHAHAHA NOBODY WHO'S ACTUALLY GOOD USE >95


-_- lol your fov really has nothing to do your skill level. Anything above 70 is good. The lower it is, the easier it is to aim. The higher it is, the more you can see. People have different preferences. You got to find what works best for you. And you know what else? I'm getting tired of explaining simple things to you. Your elo is almost 1600, yet you seem to have the pvp knowledge of a 1100. Not that your knowledge has anything to do with your skill. You'd just think that if you've been pvping long enough to get to 1600 in the first place, you'd know a bit more.

 0
PM Link

JAMCM99 wrote

Contentions wrote...



-_- lol your fov really has nothing to do your skill level. Anything above 70 is good. The lower it is, the easier it is to aim. The higher it is, the more you can see. People have different preferences. You got to find what works best for you. And you know what else? I'm getting tired of explaining simple things to you. Your elo is almost 1600, yet you seem to have the pvp knowledge of a 1100. Not that your knowledge has anything to do with your skill. You'd just think that if you've been pvping long enough to get to 1600 in the first place, you'd know a bit more.

Listen buddy. First off, I'm an 1800. badlion.net/profile/user/MeMyselfAndCube is my main. Secondly, link me to ONE YouTuber who is good at PvP who uses >95 FOV. Please. Also the funny thing is, is that you think that you know what you are talking about. But you really don't.
 0
PM Link

Contentions wrote

JAMCM99 wrote...

Listen buddy. First off, I'm an 1800. badlion.net/profile/user/MeMyselfAndCube is my main. Secondly, link me to ONE YouTuber who is good at PvP who uses >95 FOV. Please. Also the funny thing is, is that you think that you know what you are talking about. But you really don't.
Just because few YTers use over 95 FOV doesn't mean using it automatically makes you bad. Having high FOV might look weird to you, but you don't have to show your distaste like that.
 0
PM Link

Unshift wrote

Contentions wrote...

Just because few YTers use over 95 FOV doesn't mean using it automatically makes you bad. Having high FOV might look weird to you, but you don't have to show your distaste like that.
You're correct, it doesn't. However lower FOV is superior.
 0
PM Link

Contentions wrote

Unshift wrote...

You're correct, it doesn't. However lower FOV is superior.
I agree :-)
 0
PM Link
If you use Quake Pro for anything other than Archer there is something wrong with you

:^]
 0
PM Link
I'm back to using 69 again. Definitely the best FOV.
 0
PM Link

Contentions wrote

JAMCM99 wrote...

Listen buddy. First off, I'm an 1800. badlion.net/profile/user/MeMyselfAndCube is my main. Secondly, link me to ONE YouTuber who is good at PvP who uses >95 FOV. Please. Also the funny thing is, is that you think that you know what you are talking about. But you really don't.
suchspeed
 0
PM Link