Posted on 30 April 2016 - 02:13 PM
I know this will get alot of negative feedback, but this is my idea. After the "merge", have a 30 day temp period. Basically, any player auto banned is unbanned at the end of that testing period. Anyone MANUALLY banned by staff, stays banned. I think that would put some stress and testing on the AntiCheat and to really see what it's made of. GCheat gets alot of flak for not blocking ClickAim/ClickAura, so I think this is a chance for Badlion to say " Nonono, not in my house" and show drastic improvement.Posted on 30 April 2016 - 03:11 PM
The player automatically unbanned at the end seems stupid. They might take advantage of this and just hack for the fun of it knowing they will be unbanned later.Posted on 30 April 2016 - 03:17 PM
Anonymous Quote
Posted on 01 May 2016 - 01:04 AM
I don't have enough experience trying to bypass AntiSkid to be able to start trash talk. I'm an AntiCheat developer myself. Go on YouTube and look up "Worlds Best AntiCheat" and mine is the first video you see from the one and only xTurtle.Posted on 03 May 2016 - 12:30 PM
xNiiNJAx wrote
But this gives information and feedback on the effectiveness of the AntiCheat
Posted on 03 May 2016 - 05:40 PM
Ehh, not really necessary. I get where you're coming from, but again, those players were banned for a reason and until they appeal and get accepted, I believe they should just stay banned.Posted on 04 May 2016 - 03:53 PM
RowlModel wrote
By testing the system and providing that to Badlion, they'd be helping. I say that contributing to make the AC more accurate could warrant an unban, but maybe have them on probation.
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 04:11 PM
KnightDev wrote
xNiiNJAx wrote...
But this gives information and feedback on the effectiveness of the AntiCheat
Yeah and people will get annoyed because they've lost in a uhc to a hacker or lost elo to a hacker. It's not needed.
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 04:13 PM
xNiiNJAx wrote
KnightDev wrote...
Yeah and people will get annoyed because they've lost in a uhc to a hacker or lost elo to a hacker. It's not needed.
Why not do it on a "Beta" server?
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 04:16 PM
KnightDev wrote
xNiiNJAx wrote...
Why not do it on a "Beta" server?
Ehh, I don't know but I don't think is needed but if the admins and owners think it should be done then who knows.
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 04:23 PM
xNiiNJAx wrote
KnightDev wrote...
Ehh, I don't know but I don't think is needed but if the admins and owners think it should be done then who knows.
Fair enough.
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 05:10 PM
Alternatively, you could do the following:Most of the time, GCheat detects the players and auto-bans by GCheat are as usual
Sometimes, players will be "chosen" to test G-Skid (is that the new anticheat's name?), and those bans could be different, maybe 30-day tempbans…
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 05:40 PM
The player count is already growing either way. Now that Kohi has been migrated into Kohi, they'll be more players obviously. More players = Higher chance of cheaters in which can test GCheat's capability without having to go through the trouble of unbanning every single player banned by GCheat.http://prntscr.com/b0c7cb <- That's a LOT of players.
Posted on 04 May 2016 - 11:55 PM
GitRektSkrub wrote
Most of the time, GCheat detects the players and auto-bans by GCheat are as usual
Sometimes, players will be "chosen" to test G-Skid (is that the new anticheat's name?), and those bans could be different, maybe 30-day tempbans…
Lets call it G-Skid for shits n giggles.
Posted on 05 May 2016 - 06:58 AM
Or maybe, you could recruit a few closet cheaters who've been banned multiple times, or buy the ghost clients yourselves. Have a hidden server, test the ghost clients and see what is detected and what is not, and create more advanced checks to detect these clients.This is probably occurring already, as Stimpay was in another part of the server to test this ages ago, so yes, however if not, maybe a good idea?
It would certainly help make GCheat even better.
Last edited on 05 May 2016 - 06:45 PM by Astounding
KnightDev wrote
Posted on 05 May 2016 - 07:20 PM
I don't think this would really help anybody in fact