Posted on 07 August 2014 - 03:37 PM
2431https://www.badlion.net/match/kitpvp/909962
What would that be equivalent to in the old elo system?
Posted on 08 August 2014 - 06:08 AM
Expozure wrote
https://www.badlion.net/match/kitpvp/909962
What would that be equivalent to in the old elo system?
Gratz
But I'm pretty sure equating the two elo systems is impossible
Posted on 08 August 2014 - 03:53 PM
I was aiming towards around 2200 figuring I lost a lot of points for winning because I played before that was patched. :PPosted on 11 August 2014 - 06:11 PM
welp now i dont have access to my old 2431 match .-.Posted on 11 August 2014 - 06:16 PM
Expozure wrote
hope you screencapped it.
Posted on 11 August 2014 - 06:41 PM
swaggingsheep had 2300 elo old rating system in hcf ladderPosted on 11 August 2014 - 09:04 PM
Sukamakey wrote
He wasn't legit
Posted on 11 August 2014 - 09:26 PM
Ocracy wrote
Sukamakey wrote...
He wasn't legit
he said he autoclicked way back when he was 1900,and it doesn't really matter,autoclick doesn't give any advantage.
Posted on 11 August 2014 - 10:10 PM
Sukamakey wrote
Ocracy wrote...
he said he autoclicked way back when he was 1900,and it doesn't really matter,autoclick doesn't give any advantage.
More than you may believe. There's a reason it's illegal on most PvP servers. We wouldn't criminalize it if it didn't give an advantage.
Posted on 11 August 2014 - 11:22 PM
Varicks wrote
Sukamakey wrote...
More than you may believe. There's a reason it's illegal on most PvP servers. We wouldn't criminalize it if it didn't give an advantage.
the only advantage it gives is not having to click,just like when u use bsm,u don't have to hold shift all the way,we all know mc cps is capped at 4,but people love to go with rumors instead
Posted on 11 August 2014 - 11:49 PM
Sukamakey wrote
Varicks wrote...
the only advantage it gives is not having to click,just like when u use bsm,u don't have to hold shift all the way,we all know mc cps is capped at 4,but people love to go with rumors instead
So you think having it so that if your cursor just barely touches the person, even if you don't click during that tiny instance of time, you should get to register a hit? You think that, after that 4th of a second time after a hit is up, you should get to instantly hit them again, even if you didn't click the instant the time was up? If I get an autoclicker at say, 30cps, and just shake my screen left and right over the general direction of the target, I'll get pretty much the same amount of hits as someone who is at 4 cps with almost perfect aim. that's an advantage.
Posted on 12 August 2014 - 12:19 AM
JacobArnold wrote
Sukamakey wrote...
So you think having it so that if your cursor just barely touches the person, even if you don't click during that tiny instance of time, you should get to register a hit? You think that, after that 4th of a second time after a hit is up, you should get to instantly hit them again, even if you didn't click the instant the time was up? If I get an autoclicker at say, 30cps, and just shake my screen left and right over the general direction of the target, I'll get pretty much the same amount of hits as someone who is at 4 cps with almost perfect aim. that's an advantage.
autoclicker can be toggled on and off when needed,and so is constant normal clicking,4cps and 20cps are the same,i click 6-8c/s which is really slow and i beat people who click 10-20 c/s without any problem,and sometimes lose to others who cant click faster than 6,it does not matter how fast you click,as far as it's more than 4c/s,if you don't believe me make a private server and play against a friend with and without an autoclicker you'll see 0 difference.
Posted on 12 August 2014 - 12:47 AM
He used it all the way up to 2300, as soon as we lowered the sensitivity he was caught. He was never legitPosted on 12 August 2014 - 01:37 AM
well i wouldn't know,i just quote what he said