Store
Subscribe
Honest thoughts on SG 2.0
Here are mine:

1. 10000% less laggy then SG 1.0
2. Queuing is a bit annoying (but they are reverting back to queuing with the wools which is good!)
3. I like the new maps
4. Rating system is a bit buggy, but I like it.
5. New SG hub is cool and I like the parkour.
6. DISGUISING WORKS AGAIN!!
7. I think that there should be some more maps added to SG 2.0

Overall, I really enjoy SG 2.0. It's fun and extremely addicting! What are all of your thoughts on SG 2.0?
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link
Thanks for the nice words, developer were working very hard on the same, I hope they appreciate your support!
 0
PM Link
One thing that I don't like is the queue system. It takes much too long to get into a match.

Another thing that I don't like is the maps that Badlion has for SG 2.0. I haven't played Badlion SG for very long, so I don't know any routes on the maps, making it difficult for me to play. Granted, Badlion does have Vareide SG 4 and Par 72, but the other maps are unfamiliar territory for me. I suppose that I'll learn with experience, but if Badlion had maps such as SG: Shore or Vareide SG 1, I think it would be great!

Other than those two things, I believe SG 2.0 is a good update, and I know that even better things are to come in the future. Badlion is a great server with a swell development team, so I know they have something amazing up their sleeves.

Bless up!

HeroInGreen
 0
PM Link

Zaverus wrote

everything is great in sg 2.0 exept on queueing. it takes too damn long!!!
 0
PM Link
SG 1.0 was actually the best SG in Minecraft, now that I've been playing SG 2.0 a lot, I know it's absolute trash.

1. You can't vote, so the garbage maps get always played
2. A ton of teams in FFA (especially Turkish players)
3. Deathmatch arenas are way too small
4. The rank system and points are completely broken, it can take up to 2 days to update my points
5. 10000 % more laggy than SG 1.0
6. The chat is being spammed
7. The new SG hub looks bad

You can't say anything if you haven't played it.
In general it's bad.
You should grind stats, not points/ranks.

"If it ain't broken, don't fucking fix it."

@Jinxful
 3
PM Link
The problems for me: Braindead players who team in FFA and can't process there is another SG for teams

Lack of competitiveness. When I play it isn't even a challenge. It feels like playing unranked, as it has a very casual feel. You don't even have to worry about your wl ratio, or kdr since they're hidden, and only positive stats are shown.

Voting: For anyone who has played Cod, you have a choice of 2 random selected maps which you can vote for. This should be implemented in SG

The ranks: Broken, take ages to update.




 1
PM Link
Queuing - I like the ranking system I guess, but just put the first 24 in a game. No need to try and match ranks in my opinions and therefore takes too long

Teamers - People team in order to boost their own rank. Punishment for this should be very harsh. People also make To4s in Team SG which is also stupid

Voting / Maps - I actually like its being completely random and the players having no say. I like variety and learning the new maps along with everyone else
 0
PM Link

Lynkkis wrote

SG 1.0 was actually the best SG in Minecraft, now that I've been playing SG 2.0 a lot, I know it's absolute trash.

1. You can't vote, so the garbage maps get always played
2. A ton of teams in FFA (especially Turkish players)
3. Deathmatch arenas are way too small
4. The rank system and points are completely broken, it can take up to 2 days to update my points
5. 10000 % more laggy than SG 1.0
6. The chat is being spammed
7. The new SG hub looks bad

You can't say anything if you haven't played it.
In general it's bad.
You should grind stats, not points/ranks.

"If it ain't broken, don't fucking fix it."

@Jinxful

^
 0
PM Link

Jinxful wrote

The problems for me: Braindead players who team in FFA and can't process there is another SG for teams

Lack of competitiveness. When I play it isn't even a challenge. It feels like playing unranked, as it has a very casual feel. You don't even have to worry about your wl ratio, or kdr since they're hidden, and only positive stats are shown.

Voting: For anyone who has played Cod, you have a choice of 2 random selected maps which you can vote for. This should be implemented in SG

The ranks: Broken, take ages to update.





^ This
But I still think it's better than SG 1.
 0
PM Link

Kiivo wrote

Queuing - I like the ranking system I guess, but just put the first 24 in a game. No need to try and match ranks in my opinions and therefore takes too long.

It isn't.
First green message: 12 are in the queue and it's waiting a few seconds so that the game can get filled.
Second green message: Game is starting.
 0
PM Link
@DerRevilos Oh sorry that is how I thought it worked, still a along time though :P
 0
PM Link