Subscribe
HOW TO FIX UHC w/JEZI
Posted on 29 August 2017 - 07:09 AM
ok so now I've played quite a few of @xCorpe 's games and I've been xrayed to 3 times in a row. I've submitted evidence for each one, where I purposely dig myself into a hole so that there's no way I can be mined to unless its xray, i sit there in silent watching him come to me. Digging on me. Killing me. I smile cos I know il get respawned but then the evidence says "pending" for like 50mins or "insufficient". even if I ever get respawned, it takes so long that ur game's pretty much ruined anyway.HOW TO IMPROVE.
get hosts and mods that are actually good at uhc and have experience playing uhc's so that they have more understanding at identifying a hacker.
p.s. stop hosting 5.0 games ples <3
Last edited on 30 August 2017 - 07:07 AM by Robiswell
Yes we need to fire all of the uhc hosst and replace them with pvp legends who don't know how to host a uhc at all.Posted on 30 August 2017 - 07:55 AM
It seems like you're blaming xCorpe here which is very unfair, I don't think you understand that we're not gonna to ban off the evidence that doesn't hold in an appeal.As has been said multiple times we'd rather have someone roam the server cheating then have an innocent person banned
Posted on 30 August 2017 - 08:44 AM
dont get rid of them all lmfao, keep people like LongTimeNoSee who are well experienced and yes, I do think experienced uhc players should be the ones that get taught how to host.Posted on 30 August 2017 - 08:47 AM
Magiclz wrote
It seems like you're blaming xCorpe here which is very unfair, I don't think you understand that we're not gonna to ban off the evidence that doesn't hold in an appeal.
As has been said multiple times we'd rather have someone roam the server cheating then have an innocent person banned
As has been said multiple times we'd rather have someone roam the server cheating then have an innocent person banned
but that's the problem, that statement is so wrong. It shouldn't be "someone". You should have experience and a general sense to tell when someone's cheating. You shouldn't need 3 pieces of evidence or whatever to see if someone's cheating. 1 sufficient one , their stats, the way they play and other factors should help you indicate if someone is cheating or not. thats my argument. and this is only a skill that very very experienced uhc hosts like longtimenosee has or pretty much every experienced uhc player lmao. You don't understand, a person spends 40 minutes of their time they have to play games on your server to die to a cheater, 1. they probably wont get banned= no respawn= waste 40 minutes= why would I play on this server again? rip 2. you get respawned 340340 minutes later= too late to do anything cos everyone else is way more stacked=you die=rip.
thoughts?
Posted on 30 August 2017 - 11:48 AM
Jezii wrote
Magiclz wrote...
but that's the problem, that statement is so wrong. It shouldn't be "someone". You should have experience and a general sense to tell when someone's cheating. You shouldn't need 3 pieces of evidence or whatever to see if someone's cheating. 1 sufficient one , their stats, the way they play and other factors should help you indicate if someone is cheating or not. thats my argument. and this is only a skill that very very experienced uhc hosts like longtimenosee has or pretty much every experienced uhc player lmao. You don't understand, a person spends 40 minutes of their time they have to play games on your server to die to a cheater, 1. they probably wont get banned= no respawn= waste 40 minutes= why would I play on this server again? rip 2. you get respawned 340340 minutes later= too late to do anything cos everyone else is way more stacked=you die=rip.
thoughts?
People are trained that's the thing, I really don't think you understand, do you understand how false bans we'd have if we banned of sense
Last edited on 30 August 2017 - 03:17 PM by DerRevilos
Again you, a experienced UHC player has no idea what it means to get sufficient evidence. There are so many scenarios of what can happen that only trained staff think of.Anonymous Quote
where I purposely dig myself into a hole so that there's no way I can be mined to unless its xray, i sit there in silent watching him come to me. Digging on me. Killing me.
So.
Scenario 1: You see a nametag, record, sneak and dig the hole. - Insufficient. The player could have seen your nametag before you sneaked and mines down.
Scenario 2: You recorded the entire game, go to a random place, dig down and wait.
Someone digs directly to your feet and kills you. - Sufficient, as long as you coverd yourself up properly
Scenario 3: You are sneaked and someone is xraying to you, he could not see your name. You dig yourself in a hole and wait. - Sufficient if you record all of it.
I could list a few more scenarios but I think you get it.
I would actually like to see an example of your video that got denied and explain why this happened.
Posted on 31 August 2017 - 07:37 AM
DerRevilos wrote
Again you, a experienced UHC player has no idea what it means to get sufficient evidence. There are so many scenarios of what can happen that only trained staff think of.
So.
Scenario 1: You see a nametag, record, sneak and dig the hole. - Insufficient. The player could have seen your nametag before you sneaked and mines down.
Scenario 2: You recorded the entire game, go to a random place, dig down and wait.
Someone digs directly to your feet and kills you. - Sufficient, as long as you coverd yourself up properly
Scenario 3: You are sneaked and someone is xraying to you, he could not see your name. You dig yourself in a hole and wait. - Sufficient if you record all of it.
I could list a few more scenarios but I think you get it.
I would actually like to see an example of your video that got denied and explain why this happened.
Anonymous Quote...
So.
Scenario 1: You see a nametag, record, sneak and dig the hole. - Insufficient. The player could have seen your nametag before you sneaked and mines down.
Scenario 2: You recorded the entire game, go to a random place, dig down and wait.
Someone digs directly to your feet and kills you. - Sufficient, as long as you coverd yourself up properly
Scenario 3: You are sneaked and someone is xraying to you, he could not see your name. You dig yourself in a hole and wait. - Sufficient if you record all of it.
I could list a few more scenarios but I think you get it.
I would actually like to see an example of your video that got denied and explain why this happened.
that would be really helpful, I have 2 of my last games recorded, if you could explain that'll be nice cos then I can see what I did wrong so you I get them banned the next time :D
[1st]
https://clips.twitch.tv/BreakableAnimatedCrocodileVoHiYo [2nd]
Posted on 31 August 2017 - 10:07 AM
I'm sure people who are good at UHC would love to watch and moderate instead of plsyingPosted on 31 August 2017 - 04:06 PM
@Jezii1st:
You didn't change location, so the player could have seen you in that area if you were unshifted before the recording. You also didn't block yourself in so the xrayer just walked into the area and saw you standing there- the potential xrayer didn't dig to you, just walked straight into you more or less. If he argue that he looked right in your direction when he walked past, we can't prove if that was intentional or luck.
2nd:
Ill do that later
Posted on 31 August 2017 - 04:49 PM
LMFAO i just realised it's the same guy in both evidences omg i never noticed, the same guy wasted a total about 2 hours of my life wooohoooooo. isn't that dodgy? and I have the whole recording of the first one, I shifted the entire time, i didnt blockup cos he was already coming to me and i didnt wanna make sounds. this is what I was saying about experience, any good experienced uhc player can tell that he's xraying, he's explored that part of the cave yet he came back randomly , perfectly turning his head into my little hole lol, it's pretty obvious, second one just confirms it yet he will walk free and cheat on badlion while the legit players will have to waste their time dying to him. gg. but thanks anyway lol