Subscribe
To reduce confusion with bans
Posted on 14 February 2015 - 12:36 AM
Now, as most of you are probably aware, Stimpay was recently banned on the Badlion network (this gave me the idea for the thread, as I'm curious as to which hack he was banned for).My suggestion to reduce confusion is to change the ban message itself based on the detection.
As of right now, the ban message is a vague "[GCheat] Hacked Client." My proposal is to change the Hacked Client portion of the message to the hack they were detected for (e.g. autoclicker) (just like potpvp 2.0).
As the title implies, this has the potential to cut down on confusion. I imagine this would be very few lines of code.
This helps to cut down confusion because players looking to appeal now know what evidence to gather in their favor (if any).
Small suggestion, but one worth adding.
Posted on 16 February 2015 - 04:20 PM
The reason it is setup as this specifically is to create confusion for those who would try to get around it (hack client coders). It's staying this way.