Subscribe
Suggestion
Posted on 10 April 2015 - 03:02 AM
I suggest allowing first person ban reports to be of use. If someone is obviously hacking why would it need to be in 3rd person spectating?Posted on 10 April 2015 - 04:53 AM
First person evidence has to many factors put into it, such as if you are lagging and ping and all that junk. A third person video gets ALL the evidence from an angle of both players. The best thing to do is if you see a hacker on potpvp just do /report, on UHC just message the host.Posted on 10 April 2015 - 04:12 PM
There have been problems in the best regarding first-person evidence — it's too difficult to draw a conclusion off. Many players play in FOVs in which it's difficult to tell, and latency can look like cheating. Third-person evidence is a requirement because it's the best way to tell if someone's really hacking or notPosted on 10 April 2015 - 05:34 PM
does that count for flying also, like i mean if someone is flying, pretty sure first person would be fine