Posted on 09 June 2015 - 01:22 AM
I am here to make my case.A majority of your players are non-donors, and many of those players enjoy playing UHC. The problem? You can't get into them because of all the donors. I have nothing against donating or donors, but we need a limit on how many can join. Now a message to fellow donors who read this: Please do not just disagree just cause your a donor, have a non-bias view about this and see the real issue, same goes for non-donors. For example, if theres a 275 player UHC, only let 125 join before whitelist comes off so non-donors have a chance to actually get in. I understand that many donors pay a lot of money to get these ranks, and I understand that. But if everyone thats a non-donor left badlion, you would have a much smaller community. I would also like to point out that some people say on badlion "Everyone is equal." That is not 100% true, but it is a little. I want staff to take this into consideration because me and a lot of non-donors love and enjoy playing UHC but I always have to play on reddit because badlion's are impossible to get in. And I like badlions a lot better too. Realize that everyone should have an equal playing field and a fair chance to get into these UHC's. Also on this day, 6-8-15 at the 7:00 EST there was 375 donors in a 275 player match. How is that fair?
Please take this into consideration,
Pabloooo
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 04:09 AM
Everyone is equal on Badlion- donors receive no perks that make their playing experience better.I realize that non-donors can't get in often, and if the donor perk was simply a guaranteed slot rather than prewhitelist, I would fully back a limit on donor slots, but unfortunately that isn't the case.
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 04:09 AM
-snip-Posted on 09 June 2015 - 04:17 AM
It IS a garrenteed slot and also Donors DO recieve special perks that make their experiance better (For example: the UHC prewhitelist) @serendipidUPosted on 09 June 2015 - 05:23 AM
DONOR PERKS wrote
The donors paid for prewhitelist, not 'first [amount] of donors get prewhitelist and the rest get to wait.
Also, the donors have the same playing experience as the nondonors- it is nowhere near pay-to-win.
Many people donated solely fore the prewhitelist perk, and it would be unfair to limit that.
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 05:23 AM
They bought pre-whitelist. Not allowing them to do that would be taking away one of the biggest perks of donor. We can't, plain and simple. We try to host more games but sometimes it is just not enough.Posted on 09 June 2015 - 07:07 AM
It's pay-to-play in some casesPosted on 09 June 2015 - 07:43 AM
It's very rare that there isn't any slots for nondonors. Even a lion can whitelist you.Posted on 09 June 2015 - 10:17 AM
It's impossible for the network to limit this.The majority of donators that play UHC's originally bought the rank so that they could get into games with ease.
Agree that it's difficult for non donators to get into games at the moment, probably due to hosts having exams etc.
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 02:37 PM
UHC's are now pay-to-play, I don't want to take away this perk from donors, I want to make it so its not so impossible to get into. Some people don't have that kind of money laying around there house to buy donor.Posted on 09 June 2015 - 04:03 PM
Then unfortunately those people won't be able to play at peak times.Life's not fair @NoahThePlaya
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 04:53 PM
just change the system.Posted on 09 June 2015 - 06:27 PM
Skeletonise wrote
to what?
What more can they do without taking donor perks?
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 06:53 PM
Skeletonise wrote
There's no way to "change the system" without taking away the perks that the donators bought.
Posted on 09 June 2015 - 11:01 PM
I don't want to take away donors rights. I don't want to take away the pre-whitelist. I want to make it easier for non-donors to get into the game, not make it harder for donorsPosted on 09 June 2015 - 11:09 PM
My suggestion to do that? 1. Make bigger UHC's. 2. Cap limit pre-whitelist (which clearly isn't happening). 3. Make pre-whitelist shorterPosted on 09 June 2015 - 11:40 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 09 June 2015 - 11:43 PM
If I were in charge, I would have a certain number of slots for non donors. Donors could join all they like, but maybe around 10-50 slots could be saved for nondonors to join, so they at least have a chance. But if you are really frustrated about it, just buy donor, and stop creating posts like this.Posted on 10 June 2015 - 09:02 AM
PLZ LOCK, I HATE PPL YOU DO THIS CAN U LIKE PUTIT AS NOT ALLOWED IN THE FORUMS RULES OR SOMETHIN GETTING RLY FUCKING ANNOYINGPosted on 10 June 2015 - 04:20 PM
Thnk you