Posted on 04 May 2014 - 12:02 AM
Lucidictive wrote
What in the hell are you going on about if he's banned anyways?
Excuse me? Was he banned during my match? The point of this post is to ask for the logic behind not banning blatant hackers during ranked matches?
Posted on 04 May 2014 - 12:03 AM
Lucidictive wrote
ELiTE_TROLL wrote...
No need to act like that, you lost some ELO and you're acting like that? Okay.
You never said he knew he was hacking in your first post. Maybe be a bit more clear the next time.
No, it's your arrogant and ignorance that's annoying. Who do you think you are? If you correctly read the post instead of commenting thinking you know everything maybe this wouldn't have happened. Again, I don't care about losing elo that was just stated; the point of this post can be found in reading the title.
Posted on 04 May 2014 - 12:04 AM
https://www.badlion.net/match/kitpvp/147094:o) i didn't know it was so easy to be a hacker; mods dont tp when they ask :)
Posted on 04 May 2014 - 09:17 AM
Elite_Troll, you need to calm down before you get yourself banned for flaming and/or harassment…Also, moderators are required to follow protocol, if you would like to ask for a change in the protocol it would be best if you privately contacted an administrator and handled it with them. I don't know why the protocol requires moderators to wait until the end of a match before banning, but I guess it's because of the risk of moderators being wrong about hackers. If you accidentally ban someone who wasn't hacking, you'd have to refund their elo and take away elo from the other player which is a huge pain in the ass. I'm sure there are other reasons as to why the protocol was constructed this way.
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 02:05 AM
SmellyPenguin wrote
Also, moderators are required to follow protocol, if you would like to ask for a change in the protocol it would be best if you privately contacted an administrator and handled it with them. I don't know why the protocol requires moderators to wait until the end of a match before banning, but I guess it's because of the risk of moderators being wrong about hackers. If you accidentally ban someone who wasn't hacking, you'd have to refund their elo and take away elo from the other player which is a huge pain in the ass. I'm sure there are other reasons as to why the protocol was constructed this way.
I'm not mad at all, in fact i was muted by a moderator earlier for "being rude" because of this post. However, I wasn't rude considering Luciditive just comes and comments thinking he know everything about the topic, which is ignorant. I was unmuted later so it's all good.
Anyway, since you mentioned refunding elo, that means I should be given my 31 elo back for losing to a hacker and also my loss cleared.
If Morsinius knew the player was BLATANTLY hacking, why couldn't he ban?
@SmellyPenguin
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 04:45 AM
ELiTE_TROLL wrote
SmellyPenguin wrote...
I'm not mad at all, in fact i was muted by a moderator earlier for "being rude" because of this post. However, I wasn't rude considering Luciditive just comes and comments thinking he know everything about the topic, which is ignorant. I was unmuted later so it's all good.
Anyway, since you mentioned refunding elo, that means I should be given my 31 elo back for losing to a hacker and also my loss cleared.
If Morsinius knew the player was BLATANTLY hacking, why couldn't he ban?
@SmellyPenguin
Already been answered about a hundred times on this thread. ALL mods are required to follow protocol and cannot ban players while they are in a ranked match. Also, I don't know about refunding elo, going to have to ask an admin.
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 05:23 AM
MasterGberry wrote
The -31 thing won't be an issue in Season 5 as we will finally have a new rating system put together when we have more time.
Make it so players with high ELO get matched up with other players with high ELO! Have different rankings, like 1400 - 1500, 1500 - 1600, and etc
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 07:07 AM
Wow seems like me and Combo were the only ones getting his point, but the fun thing is when combo asked Cavasi changed subject about how 1300s could beat 1700s and so on.And @Ludictive you're obviously having a hard time being with other people socially and getting their points. What Elite_Troll meant was that Morsinius should've banned the hacker WHILST in ranked, since he was blatantly hacking. I agree, why wait 2 mins when you can ban him instantly IF he's blatantly hacking AS THAT HACKER was, and Morsinius even messaged Elite_Troll about it saying that he was hacking.
And @Cavasi the point Combo tried to make was that the guy GOT BANNED and if a mod is specialing and SAYING that he was hacking then why the fuck not ban in the ranked instead of waiting and letting the hacker provoke kids who cares about ELO. You're obviously disturbed, don't you know how to read or? The guy was hacking and he got banned AFTER the ranked, the moderator did NOT doubt it so why the fuck are you going on about him not hacking when he whole point is about moderators saying that they blatantly hack but waiting until the r.i.p and then banning them?
And @MasterGberry I'm wondering, WHY is this rule?
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 07:09 AM
SmellyPenguin wrote
Also, moderators are required to follow protocol, if you would like to ask for a change in the protocol it would be best if you privately contacted an administrator and handled it with them. I don't know why the protocol requires moderators to wait until the end of a match before banning, but I guess it's because of the risk of moderators being wrong about hackers. If you accidentally ban someone who wasn't hacking, you'd have to refund their elo and take away elo from the other player which is a huge pain in the ass. I'm sure there are other reasons as to why the protocol was constructed this way.
I don't get how he is rude when he's asking your fellow moderators a question?
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 07:11 AM
SmellyPenguin wrote
ELiTE_TROLL wrote...
Already been answered about a hundred times on this thread. ALL mods are required to follow protocol and cannot ban players while they are in a ranked match. Also, I don't know about refunding elo, going to have to ask an admin.
First a mod say that mods are allowed to ban in ranked only if the guy is blatantly hacking, which Morsinius even messaged Elite he was? And the blatant hacker got banned, now another moderator says that they are NEVER allowed? Cmon badlion, make up your rules.
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 07:34 AM
Resurrecting wrote
SmellyPenguin wrote...
I don't get how he is rude when he's asking your fellow moderators a question?
/facepalm
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 07:44 AM
@bwandie What if they are wrong? They have been wrong numerous times in the past.Posted on 05 May 2014 - 08:32 AM
SmellyPenguin wrote
Resurrecting wrote...
/facepalm
That however, is rude.
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 08:33 AM
MasterGberry wrote
But, if they are so sure that they are right so they instantly ban them AFTER the game, why not in the game?
Posted on 05 May 2014 - 11:03 AM
BumpPosted on 05 May 2014 - 03:51 PM
Resurrecting wrote
MasterGberry wrote...
But, if they are so sure that they are right so they instantly ban them AFTER the game, why not in the game?
Because we can go back and prove them wrong after…
Posted on 06 May 2014 - 12:56 AM
clear loss refund elo tytyPosted on 06 May 2014 - 04:56 AM
ELiTE_TROLL wrote
Nope. Life's unfair. You will get back to your proper ELO, heck if you are actually good enough YOU WILL BEAT THEM!
Posted on 06 May 2014 - 06:51 AM
MasterGberry wrote
ELiTE_TROLL wrote...
Nope. Life's unfair. You will get back to your proper ELO, heck if you are actually good enough YOU WILL BEAT THEM!
But he is not good enough that what this thread is about!
Posted on 06 May 2014 - 07:47 AM
Resurrecting wrote
MasterGberry wrote...
But he is not good enough that what this thread is about!
Get better :)