Posted on 20 March 2016 - 05:41 PM
Huahwinator wrote
No, it explains why you think our system/gcheat sucks. It doesn't give proof for it though. Text as "too good for the anticheat." annoy me af, honestly either good and bad people can possibly set off false logs (not enough for a ban though). Being "too good for gcheat" and "I was recking a kid and so I got banned lol" (in the video) is utterly selfish and it makes me believe you cheated even more so. Do you honestly believe you are too good for this server?
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 06:12 PM
Regarding "too good for the anticheat" I explain in this post that I don't think I'm too good for the anticheat. when I typed that video description out I was running out of characters (youtube now has a limit of 5000 characters in a video description) https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/99866.I never say GCheat sucked in the video description. I even bragged on it, saying it was amazing whether it banned me or not. The time I say "if GCheat is 'So good'…" I address it towards a person saying its flawless. The only time I bashed on it was saying that it wasn't flawless, that it was coded by humans, and humans are imperfect, so GCheat is imperfect.
But I feel like you only picked up on the parts where I bashed on it, I clearly go over a load more topics other than that.
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 06:18 PM
And when I say "#GCheatIsFlawed" I'm also saying that it's imperfect, I'm not saying it sucks. I also say the reasons I like anticheat in the thread I linked above. I'm more bashing on the Senior mods reflecting an attitude that GCheat is flawless, and if you are banned, then you are 100% no-doubt hacking and there is nothing you can do or say about it to make me thing otherwise.Last edited on 20 March 2016 - 06:25 PM by YiffPlease
If I thought I was too good for the server I would have named the video "TOO GOOD FOR GCHEAT?!" instead of "BADLION'S GCHEAT MALFUNCTIONED?!"p.s. sorry for the spam :/
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 06:27 PM
oh look another actively cancerous thread that makes me want to quit this gameLast edited on 20 March 2016 - 06:31 PM by YiffPlease
Your comment didn't make it any better :PPosted on 20 March 2016 - 06:34 PM
Aymbaut wrote
oh look another cancerous comment that makes me want to ban you
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 06:36 PM
https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/99866/post/528047#528047 He is right. Why didn't you make a better appeal? Then it would have been escalated to admins.Posted on 20 March 2016 - 06:45 PM
freekkiller wrote
Aymbaut wrote...
oh look another cancerous comment that makes me want to ban you
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 07:00 PM
When I made that appeal I hadn't uploaded the video yet, it was rendering out. I guess I should have waited until after I had that video uploaded to help my case. I didn't really know what to say on top of that. I wasn't expecting to be muted from everything, and I didn't know it would take a month in order for me to reappeal.Posted on 20 March 2016 - 07:43 PM
If you were GCheated, you were cheating with the likelihood of 98,47628%Posted on 20 March 2016 - 07:58 PM
I'm 99% sure that this guy []. Instead of making him feel any worse about his [] we should all just leave him alone.Posted on 20 March 2016 - 08:08 PM
This is seriously cringePosted on 20 March 2016 - 08:10 PM
That's actually lower that I thought, since people just say that you should just lie and say you're guilty, that pretty much means 100% of people, if you're going off the people that appeal, eventually admit to hacking. So I have a 1.63482% chance to be legit, in theory and according to GCheat, but, if I were able to use the Bayesian Probability theorem (that formula Tenebrous uses), which I can't, I'd probadly get something completely different, more or less of a chance, i dont know. I'd have to see if Tene would equate it out for me. XDThanks for that information! Very useful
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 09:06 PM
Huahwinator wrote
Thanks for that information! Very useful
You realize that that's just a random number right? Also Bayes' Theory isn't applicable to the situation you're describing. You need two events in order to use it. If you know the probability of event E given event F, then you use Bayes' to find the probability of event F given event E. But even then that's assuming you don't have the data that already tells you P(F | E)
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 09:20 PM
Oh… that's awkward xDLast edited on 20 March 2016 - 09:21 PM by YiffPlease
Badware wrote
what does [] mean?
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 10:11 PM
Huahwinator wrote
Badware wrote...
what does [] mean?
take a wild guess
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 10:14 PM
Badware wrote
Huahwinator wrote...
take a wild guess
Posted on 20 March 2016 - 11:10 PM
I knew it