Last edited on 22 March 2016 - 10:13 PM by DWlB
-Posted on 22 March 2016 - 10:13 PM
PortugueseBacon wrote
doggn wrote...
My point is that the Build UHC kit would be more skill-based with a flint and steel instead of a lava bucket because it takes the same amount of skill to place both but the effects are different and more balanced. That is all.
Posted on 22 March 2016 - 10:14 PM
DontWorryImBad wrote
Doesn't mean it isn't a problem though.
Posted on 23 March 2016 - 12:25 PM
I'd love an F & S in build +1Posted on 24 March 2016 - 07:13 AM
why care so much about 4 numbers?Posted on 24 March 2016 - 12:25 PM
Build kit is immensely popular right now. No reason to change it.Posted on 24 March 2016 - 12:26 PM
Unwise wrote
ISIS is immensely popular too, doesn't mean it's good.
Posted on 24 March 2016 - 12:28 PM
PortugueseBacon wrote
Unwise wrote...
ISIS is immensely popular too, doesn't mean it's good.
No, it's not. The vast majority of the world hates ISIS.
Don't make comparisons that have absolutely no relevance.
Posted on 24 March 2016 - 12:41 PM
Unwise wrote
PortugueseBacon wrote...
No, it's not. The vast majority of the world hates ISIS.
Don't make comparisons that have absolutely no relevance.
Build kit is immensely popular but it is still not skill-based enough. A much better upgrade would be for people to have the right to choose between lava and fns since that's what actually happens in a real UHC.
Posted on 24 March 2016 - 12:58 PM
PortugueseBacon wrote
Unwise wrote...
Build kit is immensely popular but it is still not skill-based enough. A much better upgrade would be for people to have the right to choose between lava and fns since that's what actually happens in a real UHC.
Sure, but that doesn't solve the lavaspam problem that you're describing.
Posted on 24 March 2016 - 04:19 PM
All right, time for me to give some points as to why it should be replaced with something:I get bad ping. You're going to be like "so git gud and counter that" Okay first of all, let's think. I'm already at a disadvantage with most good players. I have essentially 51ms, while they have essentially 1ms. That's still a disadvantage. Then there's the whole thing with lava. Basically, if you're a 1500 who's practically fucking jesus with lava, and you get a 2200 stuck in it and crit them out, then that's a problem. Especially if that 2200 has been getting 110ms consistently, and worked so hard to get that ELO. I was in the same situation in S7 and S8 when the NAE servers were in Virginia (correct me if I'm wrong) and I was getting 110ms. I managed 1700 in GApple without a donor rank during that time. But that's about it. If you are living in southern Mexico and you're getting 110ms to NAE and you work so hard for 2200 but a cheeky little 1500 who's god with lava gets you stuck in a block and crits you out and drains you 31 elo, then you might get really salty and maybe end up getting muted. And nobody likes getting muted. So taking out lava = less times people will get stuck in a block = less salt = less mutes. Then this might lead to a better community.
Posted on 24 March 2016 - 09:13 PM
BlueJewelGaming wrote
I get bad ping. You're going to be like "so git gud and counter that" Okay first of all, let's think. I'm already at a disadvantage with most good players. I have essentially 51ms, while they have essentially 1ms. That's still a disadvantage. Then there's the whole thing with lava. Basically, if you're a 1500 who's practically fucking jesus with lava, and you get a 2200 stuck in it and crit them out, then that's a problem. Especially if that 2200 has been getting 110ms consistently, and worked so hard to get that ELO. I was in the same situation in S7 and S8 when the NAE servers were in Virginia (correct me if I'm wrong) and I was getting 110ms. I managed 1700 in GApple without a donor rank during that time. But that's about it. If you are living in southern Mexico and you're getting 110ms to NAE and you work so hard for 2200 but a cheeky little 1500 who's god with lava gets you stuck in a block and crits you out and drains you 31 elo, then you might get really salty and maybe end up getting muted. And nobody likes getting muted. So taking out lava = less times people will get stuck in a block = less salt = less mutes. Then this might lead to a better community.
Posted on 25 March 2016 - 02:07 PM
doggn wrote
BlueJewelGaming wrote...
All right, I can see that this post was just for banter. However, it wasn't about bows, it was about lava.
Posted on 25 March 2016 - 02:27 PM
BlueJewelGaming wrote
doggn wrote...
All right, I can see that this post was just for banter. However, it wasn't about bows, it was about lava.
Posted on 25 March 2016 - 02:33 PM
oky cool, i seePosted on 27 March 2016 - 02:36 AM
doggn you should stop shit talking about ppl. Its their idea leave them be.Posted on 27 March 2016 - 02:37 AM
and bows are not ping based LOLPosted on 27 March 2016 - 11:01 PM
-1not a lava supported but like lava is fire and fire is in late-uhc games.
Fns kinda stinks tbh.
"git gut at placing lava scrubz"
tbh i had this issue. Use water
Posted on 28 March 2016 - 12:10 AM
1. Iron BUHC2. Have both watee butckets at hand
3. Ik sometimes the lava lag
4. There so many things u can do to counter it
Posted on 28 March 2016 - 12:16 AM
the only thing stopping people from using lava in real uhcs is they dont want to. I use lava in uhcs, want to ban that!??!?!