Store
Subscribe
Split up games
Hi hosts,
I think it would be a great idea if there is a overlflled game( like 600 people in a ffa) to split the game up onto 2 different servers with the same scenarios.
it would reduce the lag and the timer wont lag anymore.
Also as a player its very frustrating if your cave is full with like 6 people cuz there are so many players.

thanks 4 reading— iTrqced
 0
PM Link
Best suggestion as of 2016
 0
PM Link
i think this would help out so much

 0
PM Link
@mods?
 0
PM Link
+100
 0
PM Link
Only if there's another host.
 0
PM Link

LegibleToe762 wrote

Only if there's another host.

I know but wouldn't it be gr8 to play without lag?
 0
PM Link
The idea in theory is good, but…

There already would be two games getting hosted if there was another host around!
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

LegibleToe762 wrote

Only if there's another host.


Nah I was thinking to put 300 players in a mini lobby
 0
PM Link
-1
You don't have to play if you thinks it's lagging.
 0
PM Link

iTrqced wrote

LegibleToe762 wrote...


I know but wouldn't it be gr8 to play without lag?
But the thing is, if we have another host, why not host a separate game. Well that's what we do sometimes but alas no one budges. Maybe like 20 people but I rarely see people moving from the 700 player game to the newly opened game on another server. If the game itself is split into two separate games, BOTH WITH THE EXACT SAME CONFIG AND SCENARIOS (okay maybe an expection for rush or something if the second host can't host a full game) then I am +1 for this.
 0
PM Link

LegibleToe762 wrote

iTrqced wrote...

But the thing is, if we have another host, why not host a separate game. Well that's what we do sometimes but alas no one budges. Maybe like 20 people but I rarely see people moving from the 700 player game to the newly opened game on another server. If the game itself is split into two separate games, BOTH WITH THE EXACT SAME CONFIG AND SCENARIOS (okay maybe an expection for rush or something if the second host can't host a full game) then I am +1 for this.

thats what i ment: split them up with the same config and scenario
 0
PM Link

iTrqced wrote

LegibleToe762 wrote...


thats what i ment: split them up with the same config and scenario
das a gg
 0
PM Link
legible u think it would be a good idea?
 0
PM Link