Posted on 06 April 2016 - 05:13 PM
Okay, so as you guys know most streamers that die in a UHC usually get more than 1 chance at winning/playing the UHC, Some streamers i have seen go on 5-6 accounts. Why is this a thing? You die in a UHC, that's it, You shouldn't be able to play a UHC on ''someone'' else's account. Well then you might say ''but they're a streamer trying to entertain people'' but what about the players actually playing the game and trying to win? It is really annoying to have to kill these ''UHC Streamers'' that a very good at UHC and having to beat them multiple times is very unlikely. I completely disagree with the allowance of multiple lives in UHC's no matter who you are, it shouldn't matter.Posted on 06 April 2016 - 05:20 PM
+1000000000It's completely unfair to get on another account, it's basically just a free respawn.
Mods are going to reply saying it would be too difficult to moderate this. I get that it would be hard but if I rule was introduced, it would definitely stop special ranks doing it for fear of losing their ranks.
The other argument is that a rule would persecute streamers/famous players. That's true, but the vast majority of people that do this (and the only people that do it all the time) are streamers/famous players, so I don't think it's really a problem.
Please can a week ban or removal of special rank be considered for people doing this..
Posted on 06 April 2016 - 05:23 PM
+1It's not fair to other players, I know i've done this myself a few times but still I agree
Posted on 06 April 2016 - 05:23 PM
+1 !Last edited on 06 April 2016 - 05:28 PM by Zerak
I agree, but adding this as an rule and putting it as an alert for a bit would notify everyone and if streamers did this, they would either get reported people that watch and do not agree with using multiple accounts or badlion mods as i'm sure watch streams which is another bonus. Moderating this would not be difficult since mostly streamers do this. I myself have done this a few times and had benefits which is dirty in my eyes for the players that actually try to win.Posted on 06 April 2016 - 05:35 PM
+1Posted on 06 April 2016 - 06:05 PM
+1Posted on 06 April 2016 - 06:09 PM
+1Posted on 06 April 2016 - 06:19 PM
why are people +1ing this…. streamers stream for 2 of 2 purposes: For their own entertainment, and preferably attracting new players to badlion in the process. The reason Badlion wants streamers is for them to serve the 2nd purpose, optionally with the 1st one achieved as well. When streamers receive accounts for additional UHCs, all they're doing is creating extra endorsement, you have to realize this. The staff team will never eliminate this infamous procedure because while it affects "fair" chances/gameplay, Badlion grows as a server from that.Posted on 06 April 2016 - 07:26 PM
doggn wrote
People are +1ing this because it's really fucking unfair. They grow anyway when the person is initially streaming it anyway..
Posted on 06 April 2016 - 10:04 PM
Entranced wrote
doggn wrote...
People are +1ing this because it's really fucking unfair. They grow anyway when the person is initially streaming it anyway..
Posted on 06 April 2016 - 10:56 PM
+1Posted on 06 April 2016 - 11:35 PM
This will never happen. It is too difficult to regulated. Also, what about people who form 9 teams in To3 all in the same ts and then "cross team" When teammates die. Imo, this is worse. +1Posted on 07 April 2016 - 12:41 AM
Already been discussed amongst staff. Afaik this won't be happening anytime in the near future.Posted on 07 April 2016 - 01:32 AM
Alting should just be disallowed imoPosted on 07 April 2016 - 01:57 AM
Re-re-re-re-repost+1!
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 02:24 AM
I'm going to copy paste what I said on the last thread:At the end of the day, it's up to the players if they want to give their account to a streamer. They aren't forced into doing it. If we were to introduce a rule for this, we would look like complete dicks to the player base, who just want to watch streams for entertainment and if the streamer dies early then that's their entertainment ruined for the next hour or so. It would also be too hard to control as well as it would only target streamers because if we introduced it as a rule we would have to make sure regular players aren't using a friends account after they die, which would be literally impossible to control.
Like Tony said, staff have already discussed this and it won't be introduced anytime soon, if ever.
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 02:31 AM
Everyone would agree on this and yet it's still a thing :///Posted on 07 April 2016 - 08:32 AM
Freerq wrote
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 09:51 AM
so are you saying instead of a deathban, a death-ip-ban?