Posted on 07 April 2016 - 09:55 PM
WTF
Last edited on 08 April 2016 - 09:22 AM by *deleted-96553
Automatically DeletedPosted on 07 April 2016 - 09:57 PM
It's just his alt and I'm sure it already got unbanned, calm down fanboy.Posted on 07 April 2016 - 10:41 PM
he didPosted on 07 April 2016 - 11:14 PM
WOW DANTEH GOT BANNED!!!!I HAVENT HEARD YET !!11!!!1111one!!!11one1!111
Last edited on 08 April 2016 - 12:59 AM by Pulzz
Kinda scary to think that if this wasn't Danteh, the account would probably remain banned even though it was a false banPosted on 08 April 2016 - 08:42 AM
Pulzz wrote
it wouldnt, 2% of gcheat bans are false and 99% of them are solved
although badlion mods doesnt unban those who gets false banned because they disrespect gcheat, lol
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 08:47 AM
H2Q wrote
Pulzz wrote...
it wouldnt, 2% of gcheat bans are false and 99% of them are solved
although badlion mods doesnt unban those who gets false banned because they disrespect gcheat, lol
"disrespect gcheat"
Anyways, this video was released 2 days ago, and he was unbanned straight away. We are humans, not machines. We don't always accurate, but in this case the mod was not.
Chill out, and if he were not to be Danteh, he can always appeal and a Senior would of dealt with the appropriate situation.
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 09:15 AM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 08 April 2016 - 09:46 AM
H2Q wrote
Pulzz wrote...
it wouldnt, 2% of gcheat bans are false and 99% of them are solved
although badlion mods doesnt unban those who gets false banned because they disrespect gcheat, lol
This hurts my brain
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 09:46 AM
Pulzz wrote
No because mods are obliged to show evidence if somebody appeals within 48 hours from their ban
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 09:54 AM
freekkiller wrote
H2Q wrote...
This hurts my brain
Well I thought gcheat was that accurate, I guess not
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 10:10 AM
H2Q wrote
Pulzz wrote...
it wouldnt, 2% of gcheat bans are false and 99% of them are solved
although badlion mods doesnt unban those who gets false banned because they disrespect gcheat, lol
2% + 99% = 100%!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 10:20 AM
H2Q wrote
freekkiller wrote...
Well I thought gcheat was that accurate, I guess not
-Where are you even getting these numbers (2%, 99%) from? Your imagination?
-If GCheat false banned 2% of players we would have never launched it.
-Badlions mods never unban from gcheat bans because they are MODS, they can't look into logs. That has nothing to do with disrespect.
-GCheat admins like me may unban people if we think the ban was false which rarely happens, but it does happen
-GCheat isn't even relevant here because Dantehs ban was by a mod
I'll lecture you on how it really works. First senior mods look at GCheat appeals. If they think somebody may be falsely banned (for example, if somebody creates a nice appeal and gives a plausible reasoning), they throw the appeal at us and we look into it. If we think there is even a small chance that the player didn't cheat, we unban. Yet we admins deny most appeals by far, and the senior mods do even more so. That's mostly because many appeals aren't even worthy of wiping my ass with
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 12:25 PM
freekkiller wrote
H2Q wrote...
-Where are you even getting these numbers (2%, 99%) from? Your imagination?
-If GCheat false banned 2% of players we would have never launched it.
-Badlions mods never unban from gcheat bans because they are MODS, they can't look into logs. That has nothing to do with disrespect.
-GCheat admins like me may unban people if we think the ban was false which rarely happens, but it does happen
-GCheat isn't even relevant here because Dantehs ban was by a mod
I'll lecture you on how it really works. First senior mods look at GCheat appeals. If they think somebody may be falsely banned (for example, if somebody creates a nice appeal and gives a plausible reasoning), they throw the appeal at us and we look into it. If we think there is even a small chance that the player didn't cheat, we unban. Yet we admins deny most appeals by far, and the senior mods do even more so. That's mostly because many appeals aren't even worthy of wiping my ass with
idk why u wrote all this it was just a prank ..
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 12:31 PM
SporkHandles wrote
H2Q wrote...
2% + 99% = 100%!!!!!!!!!
learn to read properly
I have 200 cookies, 80% of them have been sold for a dollar each
90% of the remaining cookies were eaten, how many left?
Well what you would do is 80% of 200=160, 200-160= 40
90% of 200=180
160-180=-20
What the actual answer is: 90% of 40=36 cookies eaten, 40-36= 4 left
idk why I wrote all that just because I'm bored
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 12:40 PM
@freekkiller if someone makes an appeal with a video evidence him clicking constant 12-15 cps would you unban him even thought he is banned for autoclicker?Posted on 08 April 2016 - 01:13 PM
Khazars wrote
probabbly not,because you wont get banned for autoclicking for 12-15 cps
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 02:15 PM
KarliXon wrote
Khazars wrote...
probabbly not,because you wont get banned for autoclicking for 12-15 cps
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 02:16 PM
KarliXon wrote
Khazars wrote...
probabbly not,because you wont get banned for autoclicking for 12-15 cps