Posted on 08 May 2016 - 06:43 AM

Wasn't early - just nobody there to host games

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 06:44 AM

How is it misconduct if they're spamming? You're stopping them from spamming

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 06:52 AM

Confirmed, EU still beats NA, SA, and Oceanic (even with the Kohi boost) combined in unique daily players (and that's not giving EU the 90% or so players that are technically classified as Asia which play on EU, such as turkey)

Last edited on 08 May 2016 - 07:06 AM by MrMCIJ123_

After reading this post it gave me an idea of what might work.

I think that Badlion should have some sort of UHC Voting System. Yes it might sound ridiculous but Badlion can start out by having one or two games a day where the "Community" can decide upon what they want the game to be. The way this can be done is by having them go on something like a website where they vote upon the gamemode(s) they want the most and potentially the time they want the most and at the end of the voting time the results can be taken in and a game can be hosted, and this game could be like the "Daily Community Game". Moreover, a suitable host who is available and happy to host that "Community Game" can go ahead and do it. If in the future there are more people voting on it then you can make it some sort of a regular thing where you can have a few "Community Voted for" games a day. This could also reduce Toxicity as there will be much less players complaining about "Unpopular" gamemodes as it will be the most voted for gamemode(s) that will be selected for this game.

I have no idea if this is even a good idea but it could at least encourage EU/AU to voice their opinion on what they want to play through a vote. However, this might not work as not everyone will be able to get the gamemodes they want, but since it is a vote it means the majority will get what they want. Another issue about this is that the same gamemodes could always constantly be voted for which is why maybe you could mix up the available choices every so often for a mixed variety.

But the biggest issue of all is that if one of these Games are hosted a day then the player fill on them could be very big which is maybe another with slightly different gamemodes should be hosted, for example, Game 1: FFA [CutClean] [Horseless], Game 2: To2 [Vanilla+] [BackPacks] [TimeBomb].

Anyway, I don't know about this idea but I had thought about it for a while and it could possible work, No harm in trying it Right?

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 07:45 AM

if that is a rule, I've RARELY seen it, like literally once?

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 07:50 AM

I agree with this idea, and maybe to counter the issue of these voted games overfilling, 2 identical games are hosted at the same time, therefore the players are spread out slightly

Last edited on 08 May 2016 - 07:56 AM by RealSportsFan

-

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 08:29 AM

Automatically Deleted

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 08:38 AM

Automatically Deleted

Posted on 08 May 2016 - 08:43 AM

Automatically Deleted

Last edited on 08 May 2016 - 10:17 AM by MasterGberry

I am locking this topic. It has gone off topic at this point.

In my honest opinion the data sample provided in the original post doesn't show much either. There is no counter data for NA to prove that there are issues etc.

I feel that the only takeaways from this post are:

1. Gamemodes need to be better regulated
2. Look into automating UHC's with moderators like normal servers instead of hosts. This would be a huge topic/discussion of it's own. Might tier another level of 100 man games for "mega uhc's" or somthing else (better name)
3. Anti-Xray updates should help with the # of cheaters