Last edited on 27 May 2016 - 01:10 AM by cunucks1
Probs be useless even saying this butI think keep rating the same over all servers, if i play on Eu it should be the same rating as NA or AU whatever, at the front of spawn have a worldwide leaderboard like it is now, and on the forums have split up sections and a worldwide one as well to see how you are compared to your region and the world.
My opinion :)
(Same with UHC, SG stats etc)
Posted on 27 May 2016 - 02:38 AM
I think seperate regions would be good for s13 but horrible for uhc. Please make uhc stats network widePosted on 27 May 2016 - 04:05 AM
Ryano_ wrote
Posted on 27 May 2016 - 04:58 AM
Cobbo wrote
Ryano_ wrote...
why not both for all?
Posted on 27 May 2016 - 08:50 AM
HarrisAz wrote
Cobbo wrote...
why not both for all?
Because what if you were an AU player and played an Eu game? where would the stats go? would it go AU or EU stats? its too confusing but for arena it sound more competitive and fun. No hate just my opinion :)
Posted on 27 May 2016 - 10:09 AM
Cobbo wrote
HarrisAz wrote...
Because what if you were an AU player and played an Eu game? where would the stats go? would it go AU or EU stats? its too confusing but for arena it sound more competitive and fun. No hate just my opinion :)
both for all…
me…harris, do..you under..stand?
basically a global one goes for like now and the other one is local region like if u go to eu different au different af different
but both
Posted on 28 May 2016 - 07:36 AM
Seperate regions rating just for arenapvpPosted on 29 May 2016 - 10:13 PM
Don't separate regions. This will not create the "best player" on the rating scale. I would rather see the GLOBAL scores instead of separate NA, EU, AU, NAW, AS, and SA scores. Pls no.Posted on 06 June 2016 - 12:05 AM
Insanecuber wrote
While this is true, ELO inflation is a major factor. For example, if 10 people play NA, and 10000 play EU, even if one of the NA players was the best in the world, he still wouldn't get higher ELO. It's more fair and gives more people a chance at the leaderboards, as most people on the leaderboards are NA as there are the most players (I think) there.
Last edited on 03 July 2016 - 02:55 PM by Jahmyr
Methodically wrote
Insanecuber wrote...
While this is true, ELO inflation is a major factor. For example, if 10 people play NA, and 10000 play EU, even if one of the NA players was the best in the world, he still wouldn't get higher ELO. It's more fair and gives more people a chance at the leaderboards, as most people on the leaderboards are NA as there are the most players (I think) there.
Posted on 03 July 2016 - 08:27 PM
separate, it would help with Asia and SA coming in as wellPosted on 04 July 2016 - 12:42 PM
Treatise wrote
Methodically wrote...
Yeah, EU has more players, but I think EU is also better which makes it harder to get really high ELO.
Posted on 04 July 2016 - 01:26 PM
Methodically wrote
Treatise wrote...
Yeah, EU has more players, but I think EU is also better which makes it harder to get really high ELO.
Posted on 04 July 2016 - 01:51 PM
Ryano_ wrote
I also think that UHC should have global system and the rest should be divided into separate regions.
Last edited on 05 July 2016 - 12:04 PM by zactyy
Each region has their own, separate leaderboard, but an overall global leaderboard should be kept. This is for ArenaPVP.So there is Top NA, Top EU, Top AU, Top AS, Top SA, and then a Top global.