Posted on 31 May 2016 - 05:28 PM
SkillAuraOnly wrote
Aymbaut wrote...
SkillAuraOnly wrote...
Aymbaut wrote...
SkillAuraOnly wrote...
Unshift wrote...
Cavasi wrote...
Everyone has a problem with something, no matter what it is, it will always be like this.
Chances are there's not even that many hackers youve been matched against, especially based off the number of clearly legitimate "hackers" we get in the ban reports section.
Your brain has began thinking "this guy is better than me, he MUST be hacking". Of course there will be a cheater here and there but I really think this isn't that large of a problem
Definitely not true. I don't know how to prove it to you, but I'm not the kind to think that everyone who beats me is a hacker. Definitely not.
You sound like Donald trump LOL
Also, he's an arena mod; so I think he knows way more then you ever will
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority
because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.
It's important to note that this fallacy should not be used to dismiss the claims of experts, or scientific consensus. Appeals to authority are not valid arguments, but nor is it reasonable to disregard the claims of experts who have a demonstrated depth of knowledge unless one has a similar level of understanding and/or access to empirical evidence. However it is, entirely possible that the opinion of a person or institution of authority is wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or institution holds does not have any intrinsic bearing upon whether their claims are true or not.
He is an expert at hacks <.<
because he's a mod
because he's a mod, you must be wrong
Because he's a mod, he knows how hacks work and bans them as a job, therefore you must be wrong.
the matter here isn't about what's hacks or isn't hacks, it's about the number of hackers, so your argument is invalid
