Store
Subscribe
.legit and how to deal with aimbot
Hey guys i used to hack, so i know that not ALL Hacked clients like Nodus and Huzuni require .legit, But other clients Like… wizardhaxcraft or any new clients dont use .legit, so you cant just make them say .legit . i quit hacking and now rage everytime i see a hacker, then i ask myself why do you hack? Your not going to learn anything from hacking. Oh but i have. If the aimbot idiot s going in one way ( Lets say right) thenall you have to do is blockhit right. (Block hit deals more knockback, depending were you hit) then you can at least TRY to strafe, but i would just keep Blockhitting. Anyone watched Badlion's ComboDombo 5 strafes? Good! Because the best thing when dealing with This situation is the blockhit one, Perfected by BetterSprint! Its deadly, and if you don't know what i'm talking about, here's Combo's video: [url=

soooo just realize .legit isnt everything, fix your servers, and check out Combo O:
 0
PM Link
And yea i do suck so i watch Pvp videos :/
 0
PM Link
hell yeah niggeh blockhit for life
 0
PM Link
I am confused.
 0
PM Link
wat
 0
PM Link
.legit isnt everything, i used to hack so i know that there are clients that dont have .legit. so when some obvious hacker says .legit doesnt mean he hacks. and if you use the blockhit strafe, the aimbot ff or killaura cant really touch u unless they have reach, show in the video. oh and if u can please flagbot WizardHax's channel, the idiot who shows everyone how to hack? that'd be nice.
 0
PM Link

PlaybyPlay335 wrote

.legit isnt everything, i used to hack so i know that there are clients that dont have .legit. so when some obvious hacker says .legit doesnt mean he hacks. and if you use the blockhit strafe, the aimbot ff or killaura cant really touch u unless they have reach, show in the video. oh and if u can please flagbot WizardHax's channel, the idiot who shows everyone how to hack? that'd be nice.

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a crow." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "crow family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens. So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people "call the black ones crows?" Let's get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that's not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you'd call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don't.
 0
PM Link
@JacobArnold LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
 0
PM Link

BetterSprint wrote

@JacobArnold LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

@BetterSprint you think it's okay to call jackdaws crows. This is incorrect. It is completely unspecific, and would be the same as if I called anything in the genus Accipter a goshawk, just because the goshawks are in that genus. No one confuses sharp-shinned hawks with goshawks. Crows are in the genus Corvus, but calling everything in that genus a "crow" is incorrect.
 0
PM Link
Excuse me? XD
 0
PM Link

PlaybyPlay335 wrote

Excuse me? XD
Here's the thing that you simply cannot understand. When you call something a "crow," literally no one but you is thinking, "oh, he means a member of the Corvidae family!" They are thinking "oh, this is an American crow!"
 0
PM Link

JacobArnold wrote

PlaybyPlay335 wrote...

Here's the thing that you simply cannot understand. When you call something a "crow," literally no one but you is thinking, "oh, he means a member of the Corvidae family!" They are thinking "oh, this is an American crow!"

Jacob is high af right now .-.
 0
PM Link

TehPvPwnah wrote

JacobArnold wrote...


Jacob is high af right now .-.

You don't seem to even faintly understand taxonomy. Taxonomy is nested groups. Kingdom –> Phylum –> Class –> Order –> Family –> Genus –> Species. Remember? Corvidae is a "family." Corvus in a genus. Jackdaws are two specific species in the Corvus genus. A genus is more specific than a family. Are jackdaws in the "crow family?" Yes. Is the name of the "crow family" the "crows?" No. It's Corvidae. Members of that family are called corvids. If you're using a different name, it is colloquial and biologically incorrect. We do this to organize knowledge an animals for ease of understanding. Your usage of words is not easing understanding, it is confusing and no one does it except when they're incorrect.
 0
PM Link
stop the bad reddit references
ok
 0
PM Link

JacobArnold wrote

TehPvPwnah wrote...


You don't seem to even faintly understand taxonomy. Taxonomy is nested groups. Kingdom –> Phylum –> Class –> Order –> Family –> Genus –> Species. Remember? Corvidae is a "family." Corvus in a genus. Jackdaws are two specific species in the Corvus genus. A genus is more specific than a family. Are jackdaws in the "crow family?" Yes. Is the name of the "crow family" the "crows?" No. It's Corvidae. Members of that family are called corvids. If you're using a different name, it is colloquial and biologically incorrect. We do this to organize knowledge an animals for ease of understanding. Your usage of words is not easing understanding, it is confusing and no one does it except when they're incorrect.
Here's the thing. You said a "trilby is a fedora." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is an atheist who studies euphoria, I am telling you, specifically, in atheism, no one calls trilbys fedoras. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you should too. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "fedora family" you're referring to the euphoric grouping of le reddit army, which includes things from neckbearded gentlesirs to highly intelligent intellectual like myself. So your reasoning for calling a trilby a fedora is because random people "say that only neckbeards wear fedoras?" Let's get Mountain Dew and Doritos in there, then, too.
 0
PM Link

iBrave_ wrote

JacobArnold wrote...

Here's the thing. You said a "trilby is a fedora." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is an atheist who studies euphoria, I am telling you, specifically, in atheism, no one calls trilbys fedoras. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you should too. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "fedora family" you're referring to the euphoric grouping of le reddit army, which includes things from neckbearded gentlesirs to highly intelligent intellectual like myself. So your reasoning for calling a trilby a fedora is because random people "say that only neckbeards wear fedoras?" Let's get Mountain Dew and Doritos in there, then, too.
Haha, I'm in the room with the author of the Corvid Blog right now, actually! She initially corrected me, but the point I'm making is that referring to jackdaws as a literal species of crow is incorrect. That's mainly what I'm trying to say, but sure, I'll concede to colloquially calling the genus "crows", though ravens and crows are much more related than crows and jackdaws, so if a jackdaw gets to be called a crow, so do ravens, which never happens.
 0
PM Link