Posted on 14 June 2016 - 01:00 AM
ThatOneCombo wrote
JAMCM99 wrote...
I'll tell you most peoples reasoning.
Danteh (2.8k) is going around snowballing but then he dies, another guy, let's say he is 1900, has mined full diamond. His pvp skills aren't good enough to win a UHC so he gives his acc to Danteh who can easily win a UHC, process repeats.
Is it really fair to give a 2.8k so many chances to win?
not really fair but hey life isn't fair
Posted on 14 June 2016 - 01:35 AM
Danteh wrote
ThatOneCombo wrote...
not really fair but hey life isn't fair
UHC is luck based, its never fair
Posted on 14 June 2016 - 08:11 AM
Hey what you know. Some one found a sane way to talk about this topic. Good job.Posted on 14 June 2016 - 08:35 AM
It's not about the stats, it's the fact that they can ruin people's games.Posted on 14 June 2016 - 12:33 PM
if you watch new you_blow_i_bow highlights you will see him killind danteh 1 time and than facing him in 100x100 bc he got an alt, that's not fair he actually died when they fought in 100x100, what if nine lives was banned? probably he was going to win, do you really wanna keep this shit up? u added antixray to remove rayers but now you are not adding a rule to proibite this account multi-tasking COME ON!Posted on 14 June 2016 - 06:02 PM
MasterGberry wrote
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 02:18 AM
+1 This is really dog, I versed Ginger 6x in 1 ᑌᕼᑕLast edited on 15 June 2016 - 07:29 AM by *deleted-89753
Automatically DeletedPosted on 15 June 2016 - 09:23 AM
but i wont a free stats win from danteh:(Posted on 15 June 2016 - 09:34 AM
i take it u got killed by someone on a viewers account, got salty then made this post?Posted on 15 June 2016 - 10:44 AM
SELFYWELFY wrote
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 10:54 AM
SELFYWELFY wrote
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 10:54 AM
Unshift wrote
SELFYWELFY wrote...
Posted on 23 June 2016 - 07:38 AM
why should the accounts be assigned to a single person, if someone working hard in the UHC makes the decision to give it to another player they should be entitled to their decision.Posted on 23 June 2016 - 11:08 AM
+1, completely agree. Thanks for thoroughly explaining this, and this is basically what my stance is on the topic.