Posted on 30 June 2016 - 02:02 PM
Mirallia wrote
maybe 60 if you go really low settings
Posted on 30 June 2016 - 03:36 PM
You should basically never drop under 100 FPS as long as your CPU usage isn't getting fucked. Also make sure to actually install your graphics card and not be an idiot like my friend who wasted his 770 for 2 years.Last edited on 30 June 2016 - 06:11 PM by ITSPINGER
FPS depends on your settings…..Posted on 30 June 2016 - 06:47 PM
My FX-6300 and Readon R9 380x 4gb when they were brand new, ran Minecraft at 2000 fps. High resolution while recording 300 FPS. Csgo 300 Constant FPS. Now 1 year after that i get normally 500 fps in .7.2Posted on 02 July 2016 - 02:38 AM
ur such a troll @SmellyPenguin <33333Posted on 02 July 2016 - 02:57 AM
Kyogra wrote
yeah, don't forget about amd here. the 380 is cheaper than the 960 for the same/better performance. you might also want to consider the rx 480
Posted on 02 July 2016 - 03:32 PM
Aunk_ wrote
Kyogra wrote...
yeah, don't forget about amd here. the 380 is cheaper than the 960 for the same/better performance. you might also want to consider the rx 480
Don't get an AMD. It's terrible for Java-based programs
Last edited on 02 July 2016 - 06:30 PM by thaunking
cscooped wrote
Don't get an AMD. It's terrible for Java-based programs
Kyogra wrote
?
You're completely wrong here lol @Clique_Exec
Posted on 02 July 2016 - 10:58 PM
cscooped wrote
Aunk_ wrote...
Don't get an AMD. It's terrible for Java-based programs
4311 top FPS ever in Minecraft is Terrible Java-based program? My god u r dumb
Last edited on 02 July 2016 - 11:19 PM by HarambeV2
I have an Amd Fx-8350 and 750ti, in practice 2 i get like 600-700fps not recording, how much would i get with a 960?Last edited on 03 July 2016 - 09:17 AM by Clique_Exec
Kyogra wrote
cscooped wrote...
4311 top FPS ever in Minecraft is Terrible Java-based program? My god u r dumb
Nope, look it up before talking shit.
Same with you @thaunking
Or at least not as good as Intel for JAVA