Posted on 01 July 2016 - 05:50 AM
As someone who loved the old archer, for those of you who don't know what I mean, in archer if you got shot 3 times no matter how far your bow was drawn back, you died.One reason I think BadLion should go back to that system is that the fight would be much more sill based rather than luck. This is because If someone were to get 2 shots on you, you could have a chance to win the fight, say someone was a 2.5k archer (Lets call them player a), and they was fighting a 1200(Call them player B) and player a lagged and for about 10 seconds and player B got 2 shots off on player A, player A could very well still have a chance to win because the fight would be more skill based from then on.
Some people may say that if they lagged out and died to a 1200 in 3 shots would be very uneven and more ping based rather than skill compared to the system now. But I believe that if you were to die to a 1200 and lose 31 ELO by lag and under only that circumstance, by all means you should be able to get that back on no time, because if you lost due to lag once and only once, out of the hundreds upon hundreds of archer matches you've played and you are that skilled that you have probably killed 2k's and up multiple times it will be easy to get that elo back
Still even if BadLion converts back to the old system I think they should make it atleast 5 or 6 hits to die opposed to only 3.
This argument is very flawed but I think BadLion community could help readjust the issues brought upon by the sheer amount of players that aren't used to the old system.
Posted on 01 July 2016 - 08:51 AM
Um, no, this system is technically more skill based then the last simply because you need to land more shots, making it less luck-based.I guess I like this system (because I'm good at it lol) but I've never actually played the old archer so I can't form a real opinion. People say the old one was better but idk
Posted on 01 July 2016 - 09:07 AM
Yeah with old system it would make archer more luck based ladder..And with this one u need to land more shots as @Jahmyr said…
Posted on 02 July 2016 - 01:06 AM
Please just leave Archer alone, it gets edited like every other seasonPosted on 02 July 2016 - 01:35 AM
The current Archer wasn't the community's favorite but it is a lot more skill based. However, long-range is where you get more than 1 heart of damage in. That's why I like long range.Posted on 02 July 2016 - 03:29 AM
I would say make the archer like Kohi's prac2 without the pickaxe ofcourse because I honestly prefer it over the current archer although I am not much of a bow player.Posted on 02 July 2016 - 10:07 AM
Keep speed and remove pearls, it's so annoying when people pearl in behind a structure and shot camp.Posted on 02 July 2016 - 10:58 AM
Treatise wrote
I guess I like this system (because I'm good at it lol) but I've never actually played the old archer so I can't form a real opinion. People say the old one was better but idk
Last edited on 02 July 2016 - 02:58 PM by thaunking
Season 10 was the best tbh. It had the best maps and was much more competitive. If it were up to me I'd have the season 10 kit + mapsPosted on 02 July 2016 - 04:07 PM
I also think they should go back to 3 shot kills (totally not because I'm bad and can't bow at long distance). But seriously, when you are close range your bow can literally do 0 damage… that's just dumb.Posted on 02 July 2016 - 07:32 PM
I'm fine with anything, I just want new maps and bow boosting to be nerfed. It's retarded that you can fly around the map as much as you want and take 0 damage by hitting yourself.Posted on 02 July 2016 - 09:50 PM
Lynkkis wrote
@Hivlik I know you have a very strong opinion
Posted on 02 July 2016 - 11:57 PM
At first I hated the new archer but I've learned to like and it helped me get so much better at long range, I think the current archer is fine.Posted on 04 July 2016 - 04:25 PM
Lynkkis wrote
Posted on 04 July 2016 - 04:57 PM
R0ads wrote
Lynkkis wrote...
Posted on 04 July 2016 - 05:14 PM