Sign up Login
Store
Players Online: 4.7k
Info
Rules Staff Discord
Support Suggestions Forums Client
Forums Ideas/Suggestions LAVA
Subscribe
LAVA

Posted on 03 July 2016 - 05:24 PM

FUCKING REMOVE LAVA FROM BUILD UHC 1V1!!!1!11!111!11!
Maybe have like f&s with like 3 ticks then it breaks
 0
PM Link

Last edited on 03 July 2016 - 05:27 PM by Jinxful

-1 to the way you presented your argument. Shouting and being annoying is going to get you nowhere

With the lava situation, I think there should only be one lava instead of 2. As suggested many times already, it would make the build UHC kit more realistic. Not many people use more than 1 lava in a UHC…
 0
PM Link

Posted on 03 July 2016 - 05:32 PM

Jinxful wrote

-1 to the way you presented your argument. Shouting and being annoying is going to get you nowhere

With the lava situation, I think there should only be one lava instead of 2. As suggested many times already, it would make the build UHC kit more realistic. Not many people use more than 1 lava in a UHC…
Build does not represent a UHC scenario.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 03 July 2016 - 05:47 PM

Treatise wrote

Jinxful wrote...

Build does not represent a UHC scenario.
i just said that most people in actual UHC games use 1 lava
 0
PM Link

Posted on 03 July 2016 - 06:28 PM

Jinxful wrote

Treatise wrote...

i just said that most people in actual UHC games use 1 lava
Build does not represent a UHC scenario.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 03 July 2016 - 11:13 PM

Lmao, this was a joke. But for real though the lava spam needs to chill, you're not going to improve if that's how you win every fight
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 09:51 AM

Treatise wrote

Jinxful wrote...

Build does not represent a UHC scenario.


Without 2 lavas it would.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 10:43 AM

Jmqcc wrote

Treatise wrote...



Without 2 lavas it would.
How many times do I have to say this, Build does not represent a UHC scenario.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 11:21 AM

Regardless, 1 lava would be better in my opinion.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 01:21 PM

Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 09:37 PM

Treatise wrote

Jmqcc wrote...

How many times do I have to say this, Build does not represent a UHC scenario.


Have you ever played a single bl uhc? Or watched a single highlights video?
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 09:46 PM

Jmqcc wrote

Treatise wrote...



Have you ever played a single bl uhc? Or watched a single highlights video?
you think people have 1 stack of arrows in a UHC? Projectile protection on their armor? And most importantly, the same exact gear?
Yeah.
 0
PM Link

Last edited on 04 July 2016 - 09:54 PM by Jmqcc

Treatise wrote

Jmqcc wrote...

you think people have 1 stack of arrows in a UHC? Projectile protection on their armor? And most importantly, the same exact gear?
Yeah.


Just because it isn't completely 100% accurate doesn't mean it doesn't represent a uhc scenario. It doesn't have to be exactly the same to represent it.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 04 July 2016 - 11:54 PM

Jinxful wrote

-1 to the way you presented your argument. Shouting and being annoying is going to get you nowhere

With the lava situation, I think there should only be one lava instead of 2. As suggested many times already, it would make the build UHC kit more realistic. Not many people use more than 1 lava in a UHC…
Top half is good, bottom half… I use 2 lava.
 0
PM Link