Last edited on 04 July 2016 - 10:41 PM by Jmqcc
I feel like we can't have an argument on this forum without it getting it overheated, so I'm starting a peaceful philosophical debate.No swearing
You must be upbeat
There must be a smiley face in every post.
Here is the debate subject.
Albert Einstein once said that imagination is more important then knowledge, do you agree or disagree?
Enjoy! :)
Posted on 04 July 2016 - 10:51 PM
:))))))))))))))))Last edited on 04 July 2016 - 10:52 PM by Jmqcc
Crefty wrote
What would you base this opinion upon? :)
Posted on 06 July 2016 - 06:51 PM
You can't really imagine anything without knowing something.:) just to abide by the rules
Last edited on 06 July 2016 - 07:44 PM by Jmqcc
Treatise wrote
:) just to abide by the rules
Very true, but does also work the other way around. Can you truly understand your knowladge without imagination? :)
Posted on 06 July 2016 - 08:36 PM
Not to sure. Can you live without knowledge? Can you eat without knowledge? Can you be a good CEO without knowledge? Please tell me. Also good forum kind sir.Posted on 06 July 2016 - 09:08 PM
DittHam wrote
Well without either you couldnt do anything, but the question is more based upon, if you a lot of imagination, and average knowledge, or a lot of knowledge, and average imagination. :) Also ty. <3
Posted on 06 July 2016 - 09:50 PM
Not to sure. I may know to eat. And not imagining. And np ]:3Posted on 06 July 2016 - 11:15 PM
DittHam wrote
:)
Posted on 07 July 2016 - 01:23 AM
Crefty wrote
DittHam wrote...
:)
Last edited on 07 July 2016 - 03:45 AM by Morsinius
sure you need knowledge to have an imagination but your imagination guides knowledge and inspires not only the pursuit of knowledge but also characterizes it to apply itself for your individual needs and what you demand society to take of itthe enlightened man would prioritize not a thirst for raw knowledge but rather an application of ideas intuited based on acquired knowledge
the creative is more important than the machine
Posted on 07 July 2016 - 07:23 AM
DittHam wrote
Crefty wrote...
Last edited on 07 July 2016 - 09:24 AM by Jahmyr
Morsinius wrote
the enlightened man would prioritize not a thirst for raw knowledge but rather an application of ideas intuited based on acquired knowledge
the creative is more important than the machine
Posted on 07 July 2016 - 02:34 PM
Morsinius wrote
the enlightened man would prioritize not a thirst for raw knowledge but rather an application of ideas intuited based on acquired knowledge
the creative is more important than the machine
You kinda ended the argument. Also where the :)
Posted on 07 July 2016 - 03:06 PM
knowledge is one think, nut to gain knowledge and improve and invent new things imagination is necessarryPosted on 08 July 2016 - 02:30 AM
:)Posted on 08 July 2016 - 04:28 AM
uh disagree