Posted on 23 July 2016 - 06:09 AM
Bronze = 1200 and underSilver = 1201-1500
Gold = 1501-1700
Emerald = 1701-2000
Diamond = 2001-2500
Master = 2501+
Seems alright, I changed Silvers max to 1500 instead of 1400 and Golds min to 1501 instead of 1401.
Posted on 23 July 2016 - 06:36 AM
your saying that I'm a 1500? but i reach 2.1k last seasonPosted on 23 July 2016 - 07:38 AM
Well I reached Emerald V in Diamond and I was 1600 last season lolPosted on 23 July 2016 - 09:34 AM
They all need to be like 200 or 300 higher I think :OPosted on 23 July 2016 - 09:58 AM
if your too low a rank atm its because you haven't grineded enough, you didst just play 3 matches last season and get 1700 elo did you? you have to work for the higher ranks and stop comparing it to where you were after months of last season. also the masters are still at low ranks so they will be playing you and slowing you down if your near their rank.Posted on 23 July 2016 - 10:03 AM
iketheking wrote
So you're saying that Emerald V is a low rank? Thats what I was before the season restarted, They're saying Emerald V is 2k which is not because I was 1600 last season with about 100 matches played.
Posted on 23 July 2016 - 10:14 AM
Seems accurate to meLast edited on 23 July 2016 - 10:58 AM by iketheking
DareDevil wrote
iketheking wrote...
So you're saying that Emerald V is a low rank? Thats what I was before the season restarted, They're saying Emerald V is 2k which is not because I was 1600 last season with about 100 matches played.
first i never said emerald was a low rank. i said "IF your a low rank" which you weren't.
secondly as for trying to compare your elo last season to your rank currently dont even bother because its a whole different system they said emerald V was close to 1710 and thats probably biased on build uhc ladder where there are many players and people with a lot of elo. your emerald rank in diamond pvp ladder is probably because not as many people play that as build UHC so to get to 1600 you would be a lot better compared to most diamond players therefore you would be in a higher % of the ladder and the entire system is biased on %.
Posted on 23 July 2016 - 11:27 AM
I mean I think that it's a bit off because you used to start at 1500 for all of the kits so idk if bronze 1200 below is accurate?Posted on 25 July 2016 - 12:24 PM
I have bronzes rank bolduhc is better van dante?Last edited on 25 July 2016 - 04:08 PM by Jmqcc
Needs to be about 100 Elo higher. You've probably just gotten better since last season.Posted on 28 July 2016 - 08:10 PM
My Estimation:Bronze = 1200-Under
Silver = 1300-1550
Gold = 1600-2K
Emerald = 2100-2200
Diamond = 2300-2400
Master = 2600+
Posted on 28 July 2016 - 11:10 PM
DatGamingQueen wrote
Posted on 29 July 2016 - 08:30 AM
NameUnavailable wrote
Bronze = 1200-Under
Silver = 1300-1550
Gold = 1600-2K
Emerald = 2100-2200
Diamond = 2300-2400
Master = 2600+
its a whole entire system so it is extremely different, this is very accurate though
Posted on 29 July 2016 - 11:04 AM
NameUnavailable wrote
Bronze = 1200-Under
Silver = 1300-1550
Gold = 1600-2K
Emerald = 2100-2200
Diamond = 2300-2400
Master = 2600+
The big issue i see w/ this system is that Bronze is a 1200 elo span, silver is a 250 elo span, gold is a 400 elo span, diamond is a 100 elo span, and master is infinite. I think they should all be equal.
Posted on 29 July 2016 - 01:16 PM
Who cares dude, sorry if I'm being rude but why are we still bringing ELO into this? ELO in no way relates to how the rankings work. I mean sure I guess for you it'd be fun to compare, but there's no set format as to what ranking you are effects what ELO you would have.Posted on 29 July 2016 - 02:32 PM
godstrafezVAPES wrote
Posted on 29 July 2016 - 02:33 PM
works for mePosted on 29 July 2016 - 10:42 PM
not quitePosted on 08 August 2016 - 10:13 PM
Well I guess I'm a 1500