Last edited on 05 August 2016 - 05:12 AM by KarliXon

I dont get it, the thread was literally getting all positive comments, and when you guys got your explanations as to why you dont want ELO back we simply made some points on why it should be back, me and Hivlik kept making some points which were worth arguing(not in a bad meaning, as a fight, but in just a discussion) over, I have a feeling you are too confident over your new system, but someone said it good, bring ELO/season 12 kb and queing system back for a week or two, and see if your average player count is going up, if it is going up,then that clearly speaks for itself, if not, then keep the season 13 changes, also while you revert back to this to test, you can work on fixing the season 13 bugs/glitches if you are so confident that the new system is better, simple.

Edit: 1 thing I realised hasnt even been touched on the last thread was something like this, as you saw Danteh did a video called placement matches or something like that, and he got emerald 1, he would've probabbly gotten diamond 5 if he didnt die to a hacker bhopping
How does this make sense, he did 20 games, and in those 20 games he got into the rank which shows you are in the top 5% of the world,and he would hit top 1% of the players if he didnt get that loss(most likely), how does this make sense? he had a good winstreak you will say, but in any other mmr based game I dont think you will be rewarded that much for having a good winstreak, for example are you gonna be in top 5% of the world in League, CSGO, Overwatch, DotA or something like that from 20 games? Obviously not, as far as I know.

Posted on 05 August 2016 - 05:13 AM

Karl you should know this by now, the main rule of Badlion is to not contradict the owners no matter what!!!

Posted on 05 August 2016 - 05:25 AM

elo for badlion players is like a condom for for a sex addict , we need it

Posted on 05 August 2016 - 05:43 AM

i support u honey but be careful, +1 to ur ideas nontheless

Posted on 05 August 2016 - 05:47 AM

+1 why lock?? EVERYONE said +1 there wasnt any -1's ??

Posted on 05 August 2016 - 05:51 AM

If you're talking about https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/130375 he explained why he locked it

Last edited on 05 August 2016 - 06:26 AM by MasterGberry

I explained very clearly why it was locked. This is in the suggestions forum. Your suggestion was acknowledged and locked for the reasons I provided. Do not post another one, wait for the things I mentioned to come. There isn't a reason to have a discussion when we completely agree that the matchmaker needs fixing. Hence is why I am wasting my time rewriting it right now. There was not a single discussion on any math in that thread, pretty much everything you and Hivlik were "discussing" did not have any form of math/evidence behind it at all. None of you have spent hours upon hours of reading through research papers as I have myself. We here at Badlion are done discussing an inferior rating system.

Locking this one as well.