Posted on 20 August 2016 - 05:52 AM
First of all, I'd like to mention this idea is very much inspired by Epicube's "Famous Game UHC". Donators on that server can design a kit and load in a World full of 50 players with UHC Scenarios such as diamondless, timebomb and GoToHell.Basically, I think Badlion should do a new Gamemode called "Simulated UHC" which gives 50 players a kit and scatters them around a Map. The world border should shrink over time just like in a real UHC. There should be 6 different sections in GUI for 6 different team sizes- FFA, TeamOfTwo, TeamOfThree, TeamOfFour, TeamOfFive and TeamOf10. There should be a selection of different kits as opposed to the ever-boring BuildUHC standard armour.
Stats should be recorded to make this game more competitive.
Donators, Donators+ and Lion should be able to host these gamemodes. Donator should only be able to host games a choice of standard kits and only 2 additional scenarios however, Donator+ and Lion should be able to create custom kits to host with and unlimited additional scenarios.
I know this game development will take time but it will be rewarding as Badlion is best known for its UHC community and this will be a very highly played game on the network and it will be much better than UHC FFA's and BuildUHC meetups
I hope you guys like my suggestion <3
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 05:53 AM
+1Posted on 20 August 2016 - 05:56 AM
Big -1Posted on 20 August 2016 - 06:26 AM
SirDeqdly wrote
Explain to me why you have put -1 but its a +1 from me :D gl
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 06:35 AM
Why do you have to spread hateSomebody once tried to add something new and interesting but no there is always some of those people…
Why tf are you mad at Zigzo cause he kicked you from clan lmao
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 06:48 AM
Yeah this SirDeadly kid is just hating on my ideas purely because he was in my Clan and I kicked him for ELO Manipulation, please ignore him <3Posted on 20 August 2016 - 07:09 AM
I don't know why you guys are getting upset from a -1…But anyways some questions:
-will the host be able to play the game or just watch?
-will there be multiple games on like miniUHC's? If so then the bigger team games won't be played since people will just choose the games that are easier to get into
-you said that you wanted to make this competitive with stats, I assume this is the same competitive level as miniUHC's? Because there is no way that we're going to get enough hosts
-since the amount of players is so small, would there be default game modes like cc?
-will there be a limit to the amount of game modes? If so will it be the same as UHC?
Personally I don't think all donators should be able to host games since there would be too many to choose from and as I said earlier the bigger team amounts won't be played
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 07:24 AM
Not upset about -1Upset about how said community is
My opinions :
-will the host be able to play the game or just watch? : Shouldn't play cause he will need to spec for hackers/campers (but maybe people wont like hosting games than)
-will there be multiple games on like miniUHC's? If so then the bigger team games won't be played since people will just choose the games that are easier to get into:If players host noone can know if there will be multiple games or no
-you said that you wanted to make this competitive with stats, I assume this is the same competitive level as miniUHC's? Because there is no way that we're going to get enough hosts: Players who donated should be able to host and stats should be just like miniuhc/sg (not very competitive but you can see everything you need: kdr,wins etc)
-since the amount of players is so small, would there be default game modes like cc: Idea was to spawn for example with full iron enchanted fns rod … gapples and try to get as much healing by killing other so you can outheal somebody who stayed back whole game
-will there be a limit to the amount of game modes? If so will it be the same as UHC: I dont have opinion on this one
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 07:29 AM
"Will the host be able to play the game or just watch?"I personally think the Host should watch and administer the game just in case of Campers, Skybasers and Cheaters.
"Will there be multiple games on like miniUHC's? If so then the bigger team games won't be played since people will just choose the games that are easier to get into"
This is a factor I did not consider. I think only lower than Team of Three games should be hosted because ideally there should be plenty of games available with a variety of scenarios for people to play fast and easy. Multiple games will be on
"You said that you wanted to make this competitive with stats, I assume this is the same competitive level as miniUHC's? Because there is no way that we're going to get enough hosts" Around the same competitive level of MiniUHC's. Not competitive enough to overly care about dieing. If the games are hosted by donators they should be enough hosts.
"since the amount of players is so small, would there be default game modes like cc?" I'm not sure I understand the question entirely, but I suppose cutclean could be a gamemode but if you remember you spawn with a kit already.
"will there be a limit to the amount of game modes? If so will it be the same as UHC?" - I don't think there should be a limit. I think this minigame would be fun if there were lots of different scenarios having an effect on the game itself causing it to be more random and enjoyable
What I'm struggling to think of at the moment is a purpose or a reason for the host to host if they're just watching because surely thats not enjoyable. I think it would be good if everything was done automatically. The code for the game itself chose randomly different game-modes to play
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 07:33 AM
Big +1 good idea!Posted on 20 August 2016 - 07:41 AM
More information on Scenarios:Each Player in the game receives the same kit
They are scattered around a map
The kits should be either
Undergeared - Full Iron enchanted, bow power1 with 32 arrows, 4 gaps
Middle - 1/2 diamond, Sharp 2 diamond, bow power2, 64 arrows, 10 gaps, 2 heads
EndGame - Full Diamond, Sharp 4 diamond, Bow Power3, Dual Wield Sword, 25 Gaps, 4 heads
(EndGame and Middle should have variations of PotPvPUHC and SoupUHC)
In the Undergeared kit, the diamondless scenario should be activated to add a snowballing effect.
Timebomb should be a 50/50 chance in all of the games to make things interesting.
Cutclean scenario doesn't really affect the outcome of the game so should be ignored.
Information on GUI:
The GUI should look like this:
First select team size option
Then for example you chose FFA
Kit (UnderGeared/Middle/Endgame
Scenario(SoupUHC/PotPvPUHC/BuildUHC:Timebomb:Diamondless:OtherScenarios)
So for example the lore of the joining GUI:
FFA
Middle
SoupUHC, Timbomb, Diamondless
I really hope this isn't confusing I'm slowly losing my mind lol
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 08:10 AM
More information on Scenarios:Each Player in the game receives the same kit
They are scattered around a map
The kits should be either
Undergeared - Full Iron enchanted, bow power1 with 32 arrows, 4 gaps
Middle - 1/2 diamond, Sharp 2 diamond, bow power2, 64 arrows, 10 gaps, 2 heads
EndGame - Full Diamond, Sharp 4 diamond, Bow Power3, Dual Wield Sword, 25 Gaps, 4 heads
(EndGame and Middle should have variations of PotPvPUHC and SoupUHC)
In the Undergeared kit, the diamondless scenario should be activated to add a snowballing effect.
Timebomb should be a 50/50 chance in all of the games to make things interesting.
Cutclean scenario doesn't really affect the outcome of the game so should be ignored.
Information on GUI:
The GUI should look like this:
First select team size option
Then for example you chose FFA
Kit (UnderGeared/Middle/Endgame
Scenario(SoupUHC/PotPvPUHC/BuildUHC:Timebomb:Diamondless:OtherScenarios)
So for example the lore of the joining GUI:
FFA
Middle
SoupUHC, Timbomb, Diamondless
I really hope this isn't confusing I'm slowly losing my mind lol
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 10:13 AM
-1Posted on 20 August 2016 - 10:14 AM
HobnbsMUM wrote
SirDeqdly wrote...
Explain to me why you have put -1 but its a +1 from me :D gl
I dont need to explain you why I -1'ed. I didnt like the idea and the players who made it
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 01:34 PM
-1 not badlions stylePosted on 20 August 2016 - 02:48 PM
PizzqWithAQ wrote
Can you explain how you would make it more Badlions style and what Badlion's style is specifically? I personally think more people would play this gamemode than Badlion UHC Meetups because they're always the same.
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 03:31 PM
-1Posted on 20 August 2016 - 03:38 PM
Ziigzo wrote
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 03:39 PM
Ivq wrote
Somebody once tried to add something new and interesting but no there is always some of those people…
Why tf are you mad at Zigzo cause he kicked you from clan lmao
what?
Posted on 20 August 2016 - 03:47 PM
SirDeqdly do you have nothing better to do than give meaningless hate on my thread over the fact that you got kicked from my clan for ELO Manipulation? This post was supposed to be for discussing the Simulated UHC's idea which you only disliked purely because it was suggested by me lol.