Last edited on 27 September 2016 - 06:31 PM by Jinxful
I made a thread earlier questioning why you can't vote at all in Badlion's new SG system. Archybot responded saying that the reasoning behind it was because the same maps were being voted in. I have to agree, it could get very repetitive at times. I'm proposing a compromise which might filter out unwanted maps, but at the same time prevent the same maps from being played.Suggestion:
2 maps are randomly selected, one of which will get voted in.
I really think this is a good compromise @Archybot
I would love to hear your feedback on this thread.
This will give some choice to the players and will still stop
the same maps from being played
Posted on 27 September 2016 - 08:26 PM
-(-1)Posted on 27 September 2016 - 09:54 PM
reb_hi wrote
Funny.
Posted on 27 September 2016 - 10:21 PM
I personally really like the voting system, even if it's mean same map over and over, so +1.BTW, there can always be the option like MCSG with % votes.
Posted on 28 September 2016 - 12:28 AM
Good job. Tagging an owner who doesn't work with SG 2.0.-.-
Posted on 29 September 2016 - 04:12 PM
MeMyselfAndCube wrote
-.-
Posted on 29 September 2016 - 10:25 PM
reb_hi wrote
-(-)|1|
???
Posted on 30 September 2016 - 11:58 AM
Pls come oldbadlion because survival games 2.0 very bad old survival games we vote the map but 2.0 sg dont vote map owners pls coming old badlionPosted on 30 September 2016 - 12:00 PM
xD and +1 i wish we could vote ._.Posted on 01 October 2016 - 01:31 PM
And isn't that not allowed… I remember that the owners used the excuse of not having a max fill for uhc because they could not remove a perk from donors, yet they have removed the perk of extra votes for donors. It was listed on the store site that this was a perk so it seems pretty unfair that we as donors have lost extra votes. If they are going to use this excuse for uhc, then we might as well use it here.