Last edited on 18 October 2016 - 11:25 AM by Kikzo
DudG wrote
Kikzo wrote...
Not true, I made it to top 10 in gapple for almost two weeks and I have 180 ms
Also +1 horse is only based on ping, by that I dont mean ping like reachy hits or such,
I mean ping by delay, horse is laggy af yo. its not even fun.
Gapple and Diamond are known to be extremly convienient for people with high ping because the kb delay fucks everyone over easily. That's why bowing requires more skill in my eyes
Posted on 18 October 2016 - 02:03 PM
Unshift wrote
Khazars wrote...
i forced myself to keep reading when i saw "pig pvp is a real pvp situation" i laughed so hard i fell off my bed
high ping and low ping and the disadvantages/advantages of either one doesn't relate to what you said, "And people with high ping don't use horses even in uhcs." That makes no sense in your argument.
Posted on 18 October 2016 - 03:09 PM
Horse cannot be played with high ping, as your ping on a horse is reflected by the horses movement, making it impossible to shoot or melee on a horse. This means that people with lower ping have a huge advantage.Posted on 18 October 2016 - 04:16 PM
this is probably going to sound retarded, i haven't developed this much at all and im just spouting stuffA ladder should be added/removed purely based on what it is. Not based on the people playing it, the "conditions" you have to meet to play it, (as long as the condition is met by a fair amount of people, obviously).
The main reason people are against horse is because a high ping presents many disadvantages. you can't move, your aim is fucked up, etc.
what i don't see make sense is why this is such a good reason to remove the kit. it's the fault of the players that they have such high ping and cannot play the ladder. isn't it like saying pot kits rely on cps more, so why can't we take out the pot kits on behalf of the players who can't attain a high cps? it's the same concept really.
Posted on 18 October 2016 - 04:48 PM
NaomiBliss wrote
Posted on 19 October 2016 - 03:45 PM
Unshift wrote
A ladder should be added/removed purely based on what it is. Not based on the people playing it, the "conditions" you have to meet to play it, (as long as the condition is met by a fair amount of people, obviously).
The main reason people are against horse is because a high ping presents many disadvantages. you can't move, your aim is fucked up, etc.
what i don't see make sense is why this is such a good reason to remove the kit. it's the fault of the players that they have such high ping and cannot play the ladder. isn't it like saying pot kits rely on cps more, so why can't we take out the pot kits on behalf of the players who can't attain a high cps? it's the same concept really.
This man said it all.
Posted on 21 October 2016 - 12:12 AM
Unshift wrote
A ladder should be added/removed purely based on what it is. Not based on the people playing it, the "conditions" you have to meet to play it, (as long as the condition is met by a fair amount of people, obviously).
The main reason people are against horse is because a high ping presents many disadvantages. you can't move, your aim is fucked up, etc.
what i don't see make sense is why this is such a good reason to remove the kit. it's the fault of the players that they have such high ping and cannot play the ladder. isn't it like saying pot kits rely on cps more, so why can't we take out the pot kits on behalf of the players who can't attain a high cps? it's the same concept really.
Always standing up for the bow. :)
Posted on 21 October 2016 - 06:52 AM
Oromo wrote
Unshift wrote...
Always standing up for the bow. :)
Posted on 21 October 2016 - 10:34 AM
I like horse, but think it's ranking should be shown (but not count towards global mmr)