Posted on 19 December 2016 - 09:22 PM
emerald 5 817Posted on 19 December 2016 - 09:56 PM
fordanjen wrote
Last edited on 19 December 2016 - 09:57 PM by jarecl
iHackLiTE wrote
NotUnsighted wrote...
every ladder is the same.
silver 3 nodebuff is 1400 elo nodebuff
silver 3 builduhc is 1400 elo builduhc
masters nodebuff is 2700 elo nodebuff
masters builduhc is 2700 elo builduhc
and yes I just assumed your gender
Last edited on 19 December 2016 - 10:00 PM by jarecl
Ads_ wrote
Unwise wrote...
I don't see why it wouldn't be the same, but I don't see why it needs to be converted to Elo or why people want it that way.
Someone that converts to 2k build Elo now is higher on the leaderboards than they were in S12, and there are almost 10 '3k' Elo players this season, so surely it isn't accurate to compare Elo now with past seasons.
If I am missing something here tell me because I'm confused about this.
elo is harder than MMR because there is a limit on who you can queue with elo but with MMR you can queue anyone which makes it so much easier to gain elo
plus danteh and Tylarzz would only queue 2100s when a master (2700) can queue a Silver II (1400)
Last edited on 19 December 2016 - 11:30 PM by crusaders
Jarecl wrote
Ads_ wrote...
elo is harder than MMR because there is a limit on who you can queue with elo but with MMR you can queue anyone which makes it so much easier to gain elo
plus danteh and Tylarzz would only queue 2100s when a master (2700) can queue a Silver II (1400)
elo is harder then mmmr becasue you get drained more
-31 elo is the same as -413 points. However you can only lose 214 points
Posted on 19 December 2016 - 11:26 PM
fordanjen wrote
1997 elo
Posted on 19 December 2016 - 11:29 PM
Aerd wrote
Emerald IV - [227 Points]
2029 elo
Posted on 19 December 2016 - 11:31 PM
NotUnsighted wrote
gold III 203 points: 1729 elo
Posted on 19 December 2016 - 11:34 PM
Chocqlate wrote
Gold 2 - 244 points Global
diamond v 89: points: 2324
gold II 244 points: 1800 elo
Posted on 20 December 2016 - 08:13 AM
Jarecl wrote
Ads_ wrote...
elo is harder than MMR because there is a limit on who you can queue with elo but with MMR you can queue anyone which makes it so much easier to gain elo
plus danteh and Tylarzz would only queue 2100s when a master (2700) can queue a Silver II (1400)
I know about 3k points, I thought I read it earlier in the thread, but it doesn't take away from the argument that you can't compare. You couldn't compare season 12 to 11, or 11 to 9, so that doesn't change.
The fact that one is 'harder than the other' is another argument to not compare them. Also, if it's harder, the conversions for '2k elo' this season should place lower on leaderboards than in S12, but they place higher, so you can't back this up with evidence (please show me if you can).
On the last point, queuing would be more accurate if people didn't complain about the S13 system so much. I saw the annoyance with waiting a long time for games but it was better for getting similar ranked players.
Posted on 20 December 2016 - 10:14 AM
2240 eloEmerald 1 1000 p
Last edited on 20 December 2016 - 10:19 AM by crusaders
Radioactivebeans wrote
Emerald 1 1000 p
2240 elo = Emerald II 987 points
Em1 1000 points: 2318 (same as dia 5 0 points)