Store
Subscribe
The election
More people in this topic need to

BEND
THEIR
KNEE
 1
PM Link

Unshift wrote

Hexus wrote...

no, rhode island, with the popular vote, gets exactly the same number of points as any other state, every state is equal with the popular vote

and yeah, the electoral college would be perfect if it wasn't a winners take all

No son you are thinking of the senate. The popular vote is literally just who has the most votes overall. That's how the election should be- the person with the most people voting for them wins. The Republicans don't want to overturn the current rigged system, however, and it's not just because of winner-takes-all.

The electoral system isn't entirely based off population, as each state gets two extra electorates just for being a state. Now, this doesn't seem like much, but think of it like this. A state like California has 53 electorates that are based off its population. So 53 electorates go in for the Democrat, since they win that state. They then get the 2 extra electorates for being a state, and these are split between the 53 electorates based on population. Thus, each voter in California gets a vote worth ~1.04 votes towards the winner of the state. Now, take a really low-populated state in the Midwest, for example Idaho. That has 2 electoral votes based on population, and 2 more for being a state. So, the portion of the that state's vote that comes from population is only 50%. In other words, the vote of each voter there counts for TWO votes towards the state's winner. In other words, the votes of people who live in smaller states count for more. And, who always wins all the small Midwestern states? Republicans! Adding all those up, with the opinions of Western Republicans counting for two or more votes and those of people in large Democratic states counting for hardly over one, it's clear the Republicans have a bit of an advantage. Not THAT much of an advantage, but in close races like this, that small advantage is enough to decide the election like it did for Trump.

And it will never get repealed until the Democrats control the house, senate, and oval office, because of this advantage.
 0
PM Link
Rememebr that time Hillary

Got tons of famous people

Bought tons of negative ads

Prepared hours for the debate


and then got curbstomped?
 0
PM Link

NaomiBliss wrote

Unshift wrote...


No son you are thinking of the senate. The popular vote is literally just who has the most votes overall. That's how the election should be- the person with the most people voting for them wins. The Republicans don't want to overturn the current rigged system, however, and it's not just because of winner-takes-all.

The electoral system isn't entirely based off population, as each state gets two extra electorates just for being a state. Now, this doesn't seem like much, but think of it like this. A state like California has 53 electorates that are based off its population. So 53 electorates go in for the Democrat, since they win that state. They then get the 2 extra electorates for being a state, and these are split between the 53 electorates based on population. Thus, each voter in California gets a vote worth ~1.04 votes towards the winner of the state. Now, take a really low-populated state in the Midwest, for example Idaho. That has 2 electoral votes based on population, and 2 more for being a state. So, the portion of the that state's vote that comes from population is only 50%. In other words, the vote of each voter there counts for TWO votes towards the state's winner. In other words, the votes of people who live in smaller states count for more. And, who always wins all the small Midwestern states? Republicans! Adding all those up, with the opinions of Western Republicans counting for two or more votes and those of people in large Democratic states counting for hardly over one, it's clear the Republicans have a bit of an advantage. Not THAT much of an advantage, but in close races like this, that small advantage is enough to decide the election like it did for Trump.

And it will never get repealed until the Democrats control the house, senate, and oval office, because of this advantage.
lol woops I tripped up on that one
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

ThatOneCombo wrote

If only, only educated people were allowed to vote
so half of america is stupid?
 0
PM Link

Archybot wrote

More people in this topic need to

BEND
THEIR
KNEE
 0
PM Link

Archybot wrote

More people in this topic need to

BEND
THEIR
KNEE

i think we all have to bend over coz

WE
GON
GET
FUCKED
 0
PM Link

Jinxful wrote

This just shows how stupid Americans are.


Shut the fuck up you America hater.
 1
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

Zaptelus wrote

still shocked by the fact that the final candidates are so bad that people were forced to vote trump instead

how did it come to that im guessing is that the elections were rigged so that actual good candidates lost the primaries
stop speculating on so much when you dont even live here
 1
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link
When you get home and have 66 notifacations
 0
PM Link

Zaptelus wrote

Unshift wrote...

my relatives do and its a big deal to them because trump hates immigrants and they are

No he doesn't
 2
PM Link
Idk I'm on my soccer team with many immagrants, mainly hispanic(I live essentially on the boarder), and they are rather devastated.
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

SuperNeil64 wrote

Rememebr that time Hillary

Got tons of famous people

Bought tons of negative ads

Prepared hours for the debate


and then got curbstomped?

when winning the popular vote = curbstomped l0l
 2
PM Link

ThatOneCombo wrote

SuperNeil64 wrote...


when winning the popular vote = curbstomped l0l

can it
 0
PM Link
eZ win
 2
PM Link