Sign up Login
Store
Players Online: 4.7k
Info
Rules Staff Discord
Support Suggestions Forums Client
Forums Minecraft General Discussion Why masters is much easier to achieve than 2700 elo
Subscribe
Why masters is much easier to achieve than 2700 elo

Last edited on 12 December 2016 - 05:55 AM by Ryankoo1

MasterGberry wrote

Yea wrote...



No, that's because low level players find nothing but excuses for why they aren't ranked higher instead of getting better at the game.

I have alot of respect for you and your dedication towards badlion but I'm not sure why you're being rude here. All I did was state MY opinion why masters is easier to achieve than 2700 elo. Not once did I complain about the current mmr system for lower ranked players, I even stated it does a better job than elo at placing players in their skill group. Also I don't think gold 4 global is low ranked but that's just me
 0
PM Link

Posted on 12 December 2016 - 06:25 AM

Ryankoo1 wrote

MasterGberry wrote...


I have alot of respect for you and your dedication towards badlion but I'm not sure why you're being rude here. All I did was state MY opinion why masters is easier to achieve than 2700 elo. Not once did I complain about the current mmr system for lower ranked players, I even stated it does a better job than elo at placing players in their skill group. Also I don't think gold 4 global is low ranked but that's just me


Was chewing out other people in this thread, not you.
 2
PM Link

Posted on 12 December 2016 - 07:27 PM

iHackLiTE wrote

you forgot about the part where you play against people near your rank more often.

also, even thought the max you can get drained is 214, you can sometimes STILL get drained 214 even by someone with a better rank than you, depending on the situation. There are still some factors of mmr left in, otherwise opponents will gain/lose the same amount, but they dont always do. i dont know exactly how it works though, i just know it is that way.

also, my kdr isnt something you should rely on, since most of my nodebuff deaths happened very early in the season (around when i was emerald 5 or less) to lag spikes, because badlion had yet to move away from ovh, or even fix any lag related issue for s14.

and about the 2 consecutive losses to derank- thats not necessarily true. its more common that i fight the same player more than once rather than a different player every time. with that, if the person happens to be better or cheating, its easy for me to get deranked. anyone able to drain me once can potentially do it two times in a row.

just keep this in mind if you make edits:

if i died to a silver 1, i would lose 214 points. if i beat a silver 1, i would gain 13 points

if i died to vykz, i would lose 214 points. if i beat vykz, i would gain 100 points…

which really doesnt make much sense. i lose 214 regardless of how good the player is. if bean wasnt banned for cheating and beat me when we were both diamond, i would lose 214 points still

if u die to vykz then ur automatically bad
 0
PM Link

Posted on 12 December 2016 - 07:43 PM

DaGoldBrick wrote

iHackLiTE wrote...


if u die to vykz then ur automatically bad

yikes i hope thats sarcasm
 0
PM Link

Last edited on 12 December 2016 - 07:44 PM by ThatOneCombo

iHackLiTE wrote

DaGoldBrick wrote...


yikes i hope thats sarcasm

if you beat ihacklite in horse then ur a god



not hard


but then again! we must remember every ladder with a bow in it is skilless
 0
PM Link

Posted on 12 December 2016 - 07:49 PM

ThatOneCombo wrote

iHackLiTE wrote...


if you beat ihacklite in horse then ur a god



not hard


but then again! we must remember every ladder with a bow in it is skilless

you know i actually have valid points im not just saying a bunch of shit.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 12 December 2016 - 07:51 PM

iHackLiTE wrote

ThatOneCombo wrote...


you know i actually have valid points im not just saying a bunch of shit.

yes
 0
PM Link

Posted on 13 December 2016 - 09:27 AM

MasterGberry wrote

Ryankoo1 wrote...



Was chewing out other people in this thread, not you.
It's absolutely no secret that masters is easier to acquire than 2700 elo, and there's evidence of that all throughout the leaderboards (case in point @iHackLiTE reaching masters in nodebuff), only 3 players ever hit 2700 elo and that was in builduhc (danteh, killaruh and tylarzz). I don't see how this is bad at all though. The issue I have with MMR is finding the fine line. If masters was harder to acquire and only 1 person obtained it, that person would be satisfied but what about the others? would they give up due to the insane difficulty? would they be unsatisfied with their current rank? On the flipside, if masters was easier to acquire and over 20 people had it, would it not feel as rewarding as the last rank should? The last question is, where does the current masters rank position sit?
 0
PM Link

Posted on 13 December 2016 - 09:41 AM

dicd wrote

MasterGberry wrote...

It's absolutely no secret that masters is easier to acquire than 2700 elo, and there's evidence of that all throughout the leaderboards (case in point @iHackLiTE reaching masters in nodebuff), only 3 players ever hit 2700 elo and that was in builduhc (danteh, killaruh and tylarzz). I don't see how this is bad at all though. The issue I have with MMR is finding the fine line. If masters was harder to acquire and only 1 person obtained it, that person would be satisfied but what about the others? would they give up due to the insane difficulty? would they be unsatisfied with their current rank? On the flipside, if masters was easier to acquire and over 20 people had it, would it not feel as rewarding as the last rank should? The last question is, where does the current masters rank position sit?



gax hit 2700 i think.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 13 December 2016 - 10:39 AM

Quizzicals wrote

dicd wrote...




gax hit 2700 i think.
 0
PM Link

Posted on 13 December 2016 - 11:01 AM

Unsighted wrote

I saw people with poor season 12 stats that are now top ranked players in season 14

opposite for me usually
 0
PM Link