Last edited on 30 November 2016 - 01:18 PM by JuztChicken

So recently there was a thread talking about the top 5 Badlion clans. Ominous came first. But that's just one person's opinion and I'd personally want to find out what everyone else thinks is the best Badlion clan, so here is a strawpoll to try and find out: (These are the most popular clans)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

http://www.strawpoll.me/11768082

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

If you can't decided between them, here is my person opinion of each clan listed, I shall try to give a short unbiased opinion to each:

1) Ominous: It's hard not to be biased as of course I'd like my clan to win, but for fairness I shall give multiple negatives and positives. It is probably one of the most active clans. It has a very strong and varied skill base, and wide community, making it a very strong clan, and has proven itself by coming out 22-1 on our clan wars, we have posted every clan war we have played as lying is naughty. However, some of our players are… well… more toxic than others, and only have a small NA community as of right now. *cough* Apply Now: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/100899 *cough*

8) Genesis: This clan use to be known as the best clan, as it has very very good players, however, I do not feel that they have a strong range, most of their players are amazing at Build UHC and SG, but not so much other kits. Other than that, they've become mildly inactive to put it lightly. Also have some pretty toxic members, but some a friendly than others.

2) Aeon: This is the only clan Ominous has lost to, however, this was on NA when we had but 1 NA player against them. That being said, they have a very VERY strong Build UHC and SG team, however, in a global clan war I recon they would not fair to well, as most players haven't played anything other than Build and SG really, other than that, they are reasonably active. One massive negative about this clan is, their scores aren't fully reliable 27-0 and yet they only show 12 of their games, surprisingly only wins, plus there have been reports from other clans that they have manipulated the stats of some clan wars, not trying to cause drama, i'm just saying what i've heard.

7) Velocity: This is an active clan, which is good, however, they have draw backs, those being, they have what I would call an inconsistent team in terms of MMR rating, Matangaa, would carry them in every clan war they play, with the others only playing mediocre, there for they don't have a very strong team, but hey at least they're active, and have a wider variety of skills in their clan, which could make up for the lack of consistently skilled players, however, the clan needs to grow if they want to grow as a clan.

4) Influence: This is a massive clan! I was shocked at the shire size of the clan, the community if done correctly, can be amazing. However, as a Leader of Ominous, I know that having a big clan can also have it's side effects, such as having loads of people want to play the same Clan War. But the main drawback to their clan is the amount of players as well, they have accepted so many players at a cost, that i'm sure they're aware of, there clan is VERY inconsistent, they have players ranging from SILVER 5 Build UHC: https://gyazo.com/23153d059be73a952fd32eaa7d5c222c all the way to Emerlad 3, unforunantly they have more Silver build players and they do Gold or Emerald. However, they do actually have a wide variety of players, some who are good at Pot, bow and melee, not just all of one kind, meaning they could do well in Global Clan Wars.

6) Kingsman: This is a clan that can stand up to the better clans, they're very active and competitive, however, they need to keep to their requirements and start kicking players without specific stats, because they have players, who either shouldn't have the MMR they do have, or have tell MMR, but don't get me wrong, they're a force to be reckoned with, as they have good teamwork, and good clan experience, however, being on their teamspeak multiple times, there players could be a bit more active on teamspeak, the Ominous teamspeak usually gets about 30+ players on at peak times, and even when its quite times, there are at least 15+, I know our clan is bigger, but if they got some players to be more active on teamspeak, I recon it could grow a community that can keep players more interested in their clan. Needless to say, a good clan.

3) Cerberus: Overall a strong clan, community wise and skill wise, however, in a global clan war, they would get smashed by so many clans, because they have really, no good bow players, the best MMR was like Gold 3 Archer, however, in a Build cw, they could hold their own well, with a few good players to carry the team, but if you want to beat this clan, your best bet is bowspam, and not melee, because that's something they can do.

5) Inertia: This clan I recon would be the easiest clan to fight in a build match, with a small amount of Build players, their average is about Gold I or Gold II in build, however, they have a strong range other than build, such as GApple, and pot based kits, however, that's their specialty, by the looks of stats that is. However, they don't have any really good bow players either, however, against a clan without some strong pot players, they would destroy them, we'd sure want to do a global clan war against them.

9) Essence: One of the most dead clans, barely any active players, but back in the day was a good clan.

- JuztChicken

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 01:54 PM

Kingsman should probably be in the top 3

Last edited on 30 November 2016 - 01:58 PM by Radioactivebeans

Clans are not as they used to be , if you have +7 active decent players you are in top 10

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 02:17 PM

agree'd (not a biased opinion) but yeah i think Kingsman would be much better if they started kicking people that dont have the requirements.

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 02:18 PM

Why is the list messed up again?

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 02:19 PM

@Radioactivebeans I numbered them after I wrote about them, so it's not in the correct order, but oh well.

Last edited on 30 November 2016 - 02:27 PM by NaomiBliss

I do not see Top Dogs in that poll. The results for this will be more inaccurate than every US election pollster that said Trump wouldn't win.

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 02:58 PM

Woohoo @Metarus you can be proud!

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 03:10 PM

dont polls show the amount of people that prefer candidate A over B? And 2 million people preferred Clinton over trump?

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 03:21 PM

LOL That's very true unshift xDD

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 05:01 PM

Answer please, if you claim to be the best clan fight us for your "throne"
As @JuztChicken said, the game was EU vs NA and we could only get our 5 members on because it was late
I think we deserve a fair rematch, don't you?

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 06:00 PM

Sorry for the late response, had afterschool activities to attend. Will PM you or Chicken on skype ASAP to get further organization and information.

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 06:09 PM

Would also like to point out that I know our record does seem fishy but it is 100% true. We do not manipulate our scores in the cbs even if it is a close match. Eventually, Aeon will get a loss but as of now we are flawless and no one can tell us otherwise. Also to point out the "not showing all of our cb's", we dont always feel the need to post all of them because either we forget or we forgot the score and dont want to put a fake score on there. But we have fought 25+ clan battles even if our forums post does not list them also. Also if we fight a team where we 10-0 them then we dont think it's worthy enough to put up. And we have gone I believe 10 CB's in a row with a flawless scrim record.

(Gonna copy Kiivo xD)
-Blaszczak, Leader of Aeon

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 06:09 PM

Also I am having problems with the strawpoll, doesnt let me vote.

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 06:41 PM

cerb has cheaters :(

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 06:47 PM

Automatically Deleted

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 08:18 PM

Yes, but state polls are what matters in the end, and they were wrong.

Posted on 30 November 2016 - 09:14 PM

I'm getting really annoyed by this so sorry about doing this little rant:
We have a total of 3 silver players. They are all close friends of mine who have specific reasons. For example, the silver 5 is a GFX guy. The other silvers don't get to play much but they organise a lot of CBs and stuff. We have a large range of players who are nearly all Gold+ with just a couple outliers

This is just a blatantly untrue statement. We have less than 6% of players who don't meet requirements.
/rant
Okay, so I agree with what has been said here. A lot of your clans are wonderful, and Ominous is definitely one of my favorites.

Posted on 01 December 2016 - 01:01 AM

Ayeeeee :D

Posted on 01 December 2016 - 05:22 AM

This wasn't meant to be a dig bud xD I was just stating my opinion, your clan is amazing and it's going very well, but you have more than 'We have a total of 3 silver players.':
https://gyazo.com/6d52091d7921e8b7d0804441905120bd
https://gyazo.com/ef1bdae3dad79535a7621bf34e28643c
https://gyazo.com/0b92b7d20fd69a88402c33a26ee33196
https://gyazo.com/ba68d70f41756c74bc76239e400410be
https://gyazo.com/5b1ed47afcdbd5fe5a81843487e99791
https://gyazo.com/946383d60e486e764c9cacfa4cbc6fca
https://gyazo.com/a464124fabb2ef7b50cfbd63405a4cf8
https://gyazo.com/eb247ee6f6811140d2e0c9f264e29c40
https://gyazo.com/47c9cd368eb61965f730b9458c6aeead
https://gyazo.com/39c17781e14097c26d822183d5a7b7f9
https://gyazo.com/47e8e5f71e4d159e01dc1f7263666e0d
https://gyazo.com/11d18f817d2b619112cd95832c6bd14a

I'm sure you can agree that this isn't overall consistent, however, it's just something you can encourage your clan to work on.

I wasn't trying to be mean, just my opinions.