Last edited on 01 January 2017 - 03:15 AM by euree
NaomiBliss wrote
dicd wrote...
LOL, you're not a sharp one. You cared enough to continue returning to this thread and arguing a losing argument. Then, when it's suddenly made clear you're in the wrong, you pull the old, "I don't even care!!!!"
You said yourself that it's extremely obvious that LordBowser is AlbertEinstein. Considering it's completely allowed to use an alt when only one account is banned, there was no real secret. SuperNeil64 was just messing with you. You just wanted to look like the smart one for cracking the code.
And, "Go play some more Minecraft?" What an insult, on a Minecraft server's forums! I would hope everyone would go play some more Minecraft, rather than sitting on the forums and making grammar mistakes in PM paragraphs correcting minor grammar mistakes.
Also, what was the so called "argument"? I argued AlbertEinstein was LordBowser and the feedback I got was that I was correct! And if Zaptelus did in fact know that his clan leader was LordBowser from the beginning then good for him! However, if you think your little minecraft "we're so smart" circle can use constant bad sarcasm in an attempt to intimidate me then that will be of quite high comedic value, don't you think? After all, this is literally a minecraft website and you people act like "winning an argument" actually comes with an award.
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 03:25 AM
dicd wrote
NaomiBliss wrote...
Also, what was the so called "argument"? I argued AlbertEinstein was LordBowser and the feedback I got was that I was correct! And if Zaptelus did in fact know that his clan leader was LordBowser from the beginning then good for him! However, if you think your little minecraft "we're so smart" circle can use constant bad sarcasm in an attempt to intimidate me then that will be of quite high comedic value, don't you think? After all, this is literally a minecraft website and you people act like "winning an argument" actually comes with an award.
I thought you didn't care why are you righting five paragraph essays
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 03:30 AM
SuperNeil64 wrote
dicd wrote...
I thought you didn't care why are you righting five paragraph essays
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 03:40 AM
dicd wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
Last edited on 01 January 2017 - 05:20 AM by Suitability
SuperNeil64 wrote
dicd wrote...
SuperNeil64 wrote
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:24 AM
Suitability wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
SuperNeil64 wrote...
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:26 AM
dicd wrote
Suitability wrote...
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 02:12 PM
dicd wrote
Suitability wrote...
calm down kid
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 02:45 PM
dicd wrote
NaomiBliss wrote...
Also, what was the so called "argument"? I argued AlbertEinstein was LordBowser and the feedback I got was that I was correct! And if Zaptelus did in fact know that his clan leader was LordBowser from the beginning then good for him! However, if you think your little minecraft "we're so smart" circle can use constant bad sarcasm in an attempt to intimidate me then that will be of quite high comedic value, don't you think? After all, this is literally a minecraft website and you people act like "winning an argument" actually comes with an award.
Listen kid, you're on a Minecraft server's forums, the only interactions you will have will be with "minecraft players." As I said, you care enough to keep coming back to this topic. You're not dumb for not caring, you're dumb for saying that you don't care yet making it obvious that you do care with your repeated posts. There are many more reasons that you are not a sharp one, such as forgetting commas when trying to correct Neil for saying "PM'd," and your overall behavior on this thread.
*so-called
You asked what the argument was, and then began the next sentence with "I argued (…)" If you are performing the action of arguing, it is an argument. To think not would be fallacious logic! You acted like you were the one to discover he was AlbertEinstein and that you were smart for doing so, when this was already well-known.
No one is trying to intimidate you. You are clearly trying to win the argument just as much as we are, you're just not doing so. Maybe you're the one who thinks it "comes with an award!"
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 04:16 PM
NaomiBliss wrote
dicd wrote...
Listen kid, you're on a Minecraft server's forums, the only interactions you will have will be with "minecraft players." As I said, you care enough to keep coming back to this topic. You're not dumb for not caring, you're dumb for saying that you don't care yet making it obvious that you do care with your repeated posts. There are many more reasons that you are not a sharp one, such as forgetting commas when trying to correct Neil for saying "PM'd," and your overall behavior on this thread.
*so-called
You asked what the argument was, and then began the next sentence with "I argued (…)" If you are performing the action of arguing, it is an argument. To think not would be fallacious logic! You acted like you were the one to discover he was AlbertEinstein and that you were smart for doing so, when this was already well-known.
No one is trying to intimidate you. You are clearly trying to win the argument just as much as we are, you're just not doing so. Maybe you're the one who thinks it "comes with an award!"
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 04:30 PM
NaomiBliss wrote
dicd wrote...
Listen kid, you're on a Minecraft server's forums, the only interactions you will have will be with "minecraft players." As I said, you care enough to keep coming back to this topic. You're not dumb for not caring, you're dumb for saying that you don't care yet making it obvious that you do care with your repeated posts. There are many more reasons that you are not a sharp one, such as forgetting commas when trying to correct Neil for saying "PM'd," and your overall behavior on this thread.
*so-called
You asked what the argument was, and then began the next sentence with "I argued (…)" If you are performing the action of arguing, it is an argument. To think not would be fallacious logic! You acted like you were the one to discover he was AlbertEinstein and that you were smart for doing so, when this was already well-known.
No one is trying to intimidate you. You are clearly trying to win the argument just as much as we are, you're just not doing so. Maybe you're the one who thinks it "comes with an award!"
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 04:58 PM
Woodforde wrote
NaomiBliss wrote...
you're* dumb boy
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:05 PM
SuperNeil64 wrote
Woodforde wrote...
you're* dumb boy
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:07 PM
Woodforde wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:14 PM
SuperNeil64 wrote
Woodforde wrote...
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:18 PM
Woodforde wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
He's addicted to apostrophes because he knows grammar past an
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:21 PM
Woodforde wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
OH I get it! You're that dicd guy's alt, and you're still salty about that PM conversation. Why else would 3/7 of your posts be jumping in mid-argument and raging at us out of nowhere?
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:25 PM
dicd wrote
NaomiBliss wrote...
You also argued that Zaptelus did not know that that was his alt until you, the genius, came along and informed him.
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 05:28 PM
Woodforde wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
Posted on 01 January 2017 - 06:03 PM
NaomiBliss wrote
dicd wrote...
You also argued that Zaptelus did not know that that was his alt until you, the genius, came along and informed him.