Last edited on 07 January 2017 - 03:52 AM by boonkgang
I think there are a couple things that need to be added to Badlion UHC.When a player dies to a hacker, players rarely get respawned. I died to a b-hopper after I mined 6 gaps and 2/4ths by PvP, only to die 22 minutes in when I get a bhopper to 1 heart and I dont have time to eat any of my 5 remaining gaps. There should be a command to see who a plyer died to so players can get respawned after dieing to a hacker. I suggest when you go to /h a player, if they are dead it shows who they died to. This would be helpful for not only a mod that is looking to respawn a player, but to anybody using the /h command. If you don;t like the idea of the /h command, then maybe a command that only a mod can do to show who a player has killed.
In addition to this, but still on the topic of reviving players, makeing it so after a player gets banned for pvp related hacks, it shows who the player killed and prompts the moderator/host to offer a respawnto them. By offer a respawn I mean automatically messaging a player saying "Your killer in the UHC hosted on UHCSERVER has been banned for HACK, use the command /respawn to request a respawn from the host."
After a player does /respawn, the host is notified and can now respawn the player. I suggested that the host automatically messages them because then, even if a non-donator was killed, they get messaged and can get respawned.
This was just what I was thinking. I thought of maybe adding something to show how much damage a player has done to a certain player so if a hacker gets someone to 1 heart and that player gets 1 tapped by a legit player, they can get respawned too but I don;t know exactly how that would work. Anyways, I was just thinking this after I got killed by a bhopper and couldnt get s respawn since I only had a screenshot showing I got killed rather than video evidence. I think this would be extremely helpful and it doesn't seem too hard to do. Please leave criticsm and improvements. Thanks.
Posted on 07 January 2017 - 11:43 AM
Just curious, do you know why we need video evidence to respawn?Posted on 07 January 2017 - 02:37 PM
So they have proof that we died to the hacker rather than just a random player. If we die to a random player we dont deserve a respawn obviously so they need proof that we died to a hacker.Posted on 07 January 2017 - 05:26 PM
HmacV3 wrote
Last edited on 07 January 2017 - 06:02 PM by boonkgang
LegibleToe762 wrote
HmacV3 wrote...
If a hacker gets banned for PvP Hacks such as Kill Aura or Speed, any player that was killed by the hacker should get respawned. Odds are the player was hacked on and deserves the benefit of the doubt.
Posted on 08 January 2017 - 02:33 PM
HmacV3 wrote
LegibleToe762 wrote...
If a hacker gets banned for PvP Hacks such as Kill Aura or Speed, any player that was killed by the hacker should get respawned. Odds are the player was hacked on and deserves the benefit of the doubt.
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 03:18 PM
+1Posted on 19 January 2017 - 05:27 PM
LegibleToe762 wrote
HmacV3 wrote...
Posted on 19 January 2017 - 05:36 PM
-1Posted on 19 January 2017 - 06:39 PM
Vaxd wrote
Last edited on 19 January 2017 - 06:51 PM by Vaxd
DXASnipey wrote
Vaxd wrote...
Thinking somebody doesn't agree with you because you disagreed with them on an earlier thread is idiotic.
My reasons for disagreeing with what HmacV3 said:
1. Having it so when you /h it shows who the player died to is not necessary because the only way to get respawned for hacking is with video evidence so if somebody has evidence of them getting hacked on it will show who killed them and the host can respawn them.
2. /respawn. Pointless, the person who has video evidence will send it to a host and if it's deemed sufficient will get respawned. If you leave the uhc to go play arena and in that time the evidence is deemed sufficient but you aren't there to get a respawn that's your own fault.
My reason for disagreeing with what you said:
A player should not get respawned just for dying to somebody who hacked on others. If somebody kills 10 people, hacks on 5 and doesnt hack on others the 5 who got hacked on do not have any reason to be respawned. They died to somebody playing legitimate.
Posted on 19 January 2017 - 06:57 PM
A player should not get respawned just for dying to somebody who hacked on others. If somebody kills 10 people, hacks on 5 and doesnt hack on others the 5 who got hacked on do not have any reason to be respawned. They died to somebody playing legitimate. Say that there was a player who hacked on 2 players killed another 2 legit. Do you think that the players who got killed legit should be respawned? In my opinion yes because the player should have been banned in the first place. I HIGHLY doubt someone would hack on a whole bunch of players then start playing legit. Especially if someone has been suspected by cheats by the player who reported him. Its the most retarded rule and needs to be removed.
Last edited on 19 January 2017 - 07:20 PM by dilbertt
I can tell you right now, no cheater isn't going to only cheat on some people and fight others legit. That reasoning is just retarded. Cheaters are given the benefit of the doubt half the time and are unbanned, so why shouldn't it be given to the players who the cheaters actually caused harm? And by the time people even upload evidence from dying 20 minutes and the cheater gets banned, the earliest they get respawned in is at 45m so what's even the point.Posted on 19 January 2017 - 11:54 PM
Vaxd wrote
DXASnipey wrote...
Thinking somebody doesn't agree with you because you disagreed with them on an earlier thread is idiotic.
My reasons for disagreeing with what HmacV3 said:
1. Having it so when you /h it shows who the player died to is not necessary because the only way to get respawned for hacking is with video evidence so if somebody has evidence of them getting hacked on it will show who killed them and the host can respawn them.
2. /respawn. Pointless, the person who has video evidence will send it to a host and if it's deemed sufficient will get respawned. If you leave the uhc to go play arena and in that time the evidence is deemed sufficient but you aren't there to get a respawn that's your own fault.
My reason for disagreeing with what you said:
A player should not get respawned just for dying to somebody who hacked on others. If somebody kills 10 people, hacks on 5 and doesnt hack on others the 5 who got hacked on do not have any reason to be respawned. They died to somebody playing legitimate.
Cant even begin to tell you how retarded your whole post is
Posted on 20 January 2017 - 12:21 AM
HmacV3 wrote
Vaxd wrote...
Cant even begin to tell you how retarded your whole post is
Instead of telling you why I disagree I'm gonna call everything you said retarded!!
Last edited on 20 January 2017 - 12:29 AM by Vaxd
DXASnipey wrote
A player should not get respawned just for dying to somebody who hacked on others. If somebody kills 10 people, hacks on 5 and doesnt hack on others the 5 who got hacked on do not have any reason to be respawned. They died to somebody playing legitimate.
Just because you highly doubt something does not mean it doesn't happen because I've seen it happen plenty of times. How is having a rule so only somebody who died to a cheater get's respawned retarded? If somebody dies fair and square to somebody who cheated on others how is that reason to get respawned?
Not sure why the quoting is messed up on this.
Posted on 20 January 2017 - 12:26 AM
TS720p wrote
1. There are people who cheat but don't cheat on people that record/stream, it happens a fair bit.
2. Not true lol
3. If there's no point then why complain about it?
Posted on 20 January 2017 - 10:44 AM
Vaxd wrote
TS720p wrote...
1. There are people who cheat but don't cheat on people that record/stream, it happens a fair bit.
2. Not true lol
3. If there's no point then why complain about it?
Posted on 20 January 2017 - 04:04 PM
Vaxd wrote
HmacV3 wrote...
Instead of telling you why I disagree I'm gonna call everything you said retarded!!
Because I dont care enough about it to write 10 paragraphs about how your points are all retarded
Posted on 20 January 2017 - 04:10 PM
HmacV3 wrote
Vaxd wrote...
Because I dont care enough about it to write 10 paragraphs about how your points are all retarded
Then don't try to argue a point in the first place if you aren't going to defend it.