Posted on 09 January 2017 - 05:54 AM
Panda_Chips wrote
Jarecl wrote...
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 06:07 AM
Really depends on ur point or view, but i personally prefer The system kohi had where you where when you searched for a match it gives 200 elo both directions so you fight players with The same skill level, and after a while it would increase the elo diffrencePosted on 09 January 2017 - 07:04 AM
Jarecl wrote
Ny_ wrote...
also, idk why archy has gotta be so secretive about the formula he always has been since the start
plus ur in contagion nice
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 07:16 AM
Unshift wrote
Jarecl wrote...
Last edited on 09 January 2017 - 07:26 AM by iHackLiTE
why do people care, theyre both rating systems. the better players are still on top and the bad players are still on bottom.Posted on 09 January 2017 - 03:20 PM
TS720p wrote
RetrosStackOfFov wrote...
I'm soo done
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 03:23 PM
iHackLiTE wrote
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 03:29 PM
Tyguy95 wrote
represent.
Last edited on 03 February 2017 - 02:30 PM by Haris
Imo, elo is better, I mean check the leader-boards from this season to last season… Why are there so many different and new people? This is because sweaty tryhards who have leaps of time can grind for Masters, with Elo if you were a consistent player you could get very high ratings in a lot less matches, whereas with MMR you don't have to be a consistent player, you can lose a lot of matches and still get Masters, my evidence for this is to just check the KDR with MMR compared to ELO. Overall what I am trying to say is, with MMR you have to have so much more time to actually get somewhere on the leader-boards than ELO where you could prove how good you are with an insane KDR which shows consistency and skill.Just an opinion, I only want the best.
Last edited on 03 February 2017 - 02:30 PM by Haris
Ads_ wrote
iHackLiTE wrote...
bv
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 03:38 PM
Who makes a post about "loyal" individuals wanting something back but doesn't actually want it back?You're fibbing about the purpose of this post, and you know it.
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 04:14 PM
Haris wrote
Ads_ wrote...
Do you mean the players with more time? From what I can see the 'top' players have thousands of matches, I'm pretty sure you're just saying the top players are at the top because this is the first season you have been 1st in something because you so much time to dedicate to this game XD. In previous seasons, people could reach leaderboards in a couple hundred matches, now you need to have at least double from before from what I am seeing.
The Season 13 system placed you in roughly the correct position after 20 matches. It's hard to see this because hackers were reaching the leaderboards (they would play 20 games to get 20-0, where they didn't get GCheated, then never played again. This is why the BuildUHC leaderboard is messed up badly, but the archer one isn't too bad because cheaters don't really gain much in archer) and a lot of players didn't play much simply because they didn't like the system. With BAC and slight tweaks to the S13 system you'd get more accurate placements in a lot fewer matches.
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 07:38 PM
LordBowser wrote
You're fibbing about the purpose of this post, and you know it.
Nah, I was just curious. I wanted to see what the community thought of the change some time after it had happened. To have a healthy discussion about whether or not it was something that the community as a whole accepted as the new status quo. Yes, I would prefer it to come back, but I think that is just nostalgia more than anything.
Posted on 09 January 2017 - 10:41 PM
I would prefer it if they change it so you wait longer but people who are emerald+ can't queue someone who is two full ranks lower or above you, but MMR is fine