Posted on 02 February 2017 - 12:38 PM
LauraRussels wrote
As Karlixon said in his thread, this is not a rage thread.
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 12:53 PM
The only thing I liked about badlion was SG 2.0 and that was mehPosted on 02 February 2017 - 01:24 PM
Dude ur a legend bc u have my skin and bc u know what's up. No top player likes mmr bc like verillium said it's mad ez and boring. Ik archy will say that they don't plan on moving back to elo bc all of the middle/averagely skilled players prefer it, however if you are trying to make badlion more competitive, wouldn't u want the input of the best players?Posted on 02 February 2017 - 01:53 PM
TakeMySoul wrote
Skymonpro wrote...
Kid with 3 bans kissing Archy's ass so his next appeal will be accepted and Archy is the one complaining about the community.
The bans were 2 years ago dumbass
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:00 PM
Tyguy95 wrote
I LOVE YOU DADDY CUCUMBER
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:00 PM
Skymonpro wrote
TakeMySoul wrote...
The bans were 2 years ago dumbass
You're still dumb
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:02 PM
TakeMySoul wrote
Skymonpro wrote...
You're still dumb
You're retarded.
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:10 PM
I'm not a cucumber idk who u r but ur a legend and NOT A CUCUMBERLast edited on 02 February 2017 - 02:15 PM by TAKEMYS0UL
Tyguy95 wrote
You have a cucumber skin ;-;
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:18 PM
TakeMySoul wrote
Kikzo wrote...
Hey mr Dino
delete
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:18 PM
Kikzo wrote
TakeMySoul wrote...
delete
I can't ;_;
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:23 PM
Kikzo wrote
TakeMySoul wrote...
delete
Did anyone say… DELETE!?

Posted on 02 February 2017 - 02:45 PM
I preferred the ELO system so much better. It felt more rewarding to have 2500 instead of "Masters Rank" or something along those lines. ELO didn't have an end goal, it was unlimited. But with the new ranking system there is an end goal, masters.Posted on 02 February 2017 - 03:16 PM
Metarus wrote
TakeMySoul wrote...
Oh wow, it's amusing to see people who aren't as experienced have an opinion? I have legitimately no clue where you're coming from.
Jmqcc wrote...
The points in reply to this were idiotic. We aren't discussing whether or not people with lower rating are skilled PvPers, we're discussing the mathematics and the logic behind the rating systems. Having a say in the rating system is not relevant to their rating themselves, it's relevant to the math and statistics behind it, as Jmqcc said.
TakeMySoul wrote...
Oh wow, let's call him an 8 year old. No. Give him valid points as to why he's wrong. I don't care how dumb his points are (which they're not), there is no purpose in calling anyone on here an 8 year old (unless they're actually 8).
Lastly, reply to these points from Archybot:
Archybot wrote...
If you cannot argue against these points, then why are you here? As I always say, an argument/discussion focuses on the other person's points, not the other person; if you resort to aimlessly taking shots at the opposition, you aren't arguing.
dont make me cringe again
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 03:18 PM
Unshift wrote
Metarus wrote...
dont make me cringe again
I gave like 5 arguments in the comment section and Karlixon added 340982402 more so it is not my fault that you can't read.
Posted on 02 February 2017 - 03:27 PM