Posted on 22 October 2014 - 10:44 AM
Ok this is one of the coolest posts I've seen in a while.That's pretty cool
Posted on 22 October 2014 - 12:10 PM
Very interesting and well analyzed post :)Posted on 22 October 2014 - 02:24 PM
The "thoughts about each ladder" section seems too opinionated to use in a post regarding ladder analysis, but otherwise, there's some cool info here.Posted on 22 October 2014 - 04:34 PM
http://www.photos-public-domain.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/b-plus-school-letter-grade.jpgPosted on 22 October 2014 - 10:19 PM
VertX_ wrote
m8 change that to a A this was definetly more than what 80% us could even have done
Posted on 23 October 2014 - 12:43 AM
I think I brainfarted at least twice throughout that post, I love it!Posted on 23 October 2014 - 02:42 AM
http://w4wn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/A+reportcardsmall.jpgPosted on 23 October 2014 - 04:35 AM
You seem to be someone that just uses a bow >_>Posted on 23 October 2014 - 05:52 AM
I'm just looking at this and thinking if we should display win rate? Fighting hackers could skew the data a bit, but once one plays enough matches, it should average out it seems.@MasterGberry
Posted on 23 October 2014 - 07:46 AM
SmellyPenguin wrote
@MasterGberry
So am i being asked to show their win % on the ladder pages?
Posted on 24 October 2014 - 05:32 AM
Good analysis, UHC is for sure the most competitive, but (and i hate it personally) vanilla doesn't have a low winrate because of making a fatal mistake IMO. I think it's that with all OP kits, the first half of the fight counts for nothing. It's very hard to die. By the end of the long fight, people are a bit tired and zoned out a bit, I think it's that people can get tired of the fight.