Store
Subscribe
Ranked ladder w/ highest skillcap?

CraftainJulius wrote

Archer.

Strategy is almost completely different for each kind of range, and there are a lot of tactics for each one.

It uses fast reaction time, mind games, aim, strafing and more.

Not tryna roast but

lol
 0
PM Link

ProgressiveHouse wrote

HIVLIK wrote...



archer: if you're fighting someone who doesn't bowboost every 5 seconds then it can be a good fight

YES YES YES.
 0
PM Link

Stanenberg wrote

I wonder why people think sg is that skillbased. One lucky combo/fns/bowhit often wins the game. In SG its pretty easy to get lucky wins against far better players while in kits like Archer or Pot its almost impossible to beat a consistent and good player.
I mean, if you're in the top 50 in and have the ability to stay consistent in such a random ladder, I'd say it's skill-based.
 0
PM Link

Ryankoo1 wrote

CraftainJulius wrote...


Not tryna roast but

lol



I only do build on this account. Please don't make assumptions.

Not exactly a god at bow or ANY pvp in general, but I'm not that bad lmfao

https://www.badlion.net/profile/user/juparosa
 0
PM Link

CraftainJulius wrote

Archer.

Strategy is almost completely different for each kind of range, and there are a lot of tactics for each one.

It uses fast reaction time, mind games, aim, strafing and more.


I can understand archer can be a ladder with a deep "meta" (idk if that the right term) But i feel all those factors that exist in archer can only be appreciated once you are good at it (and your opponent is good as well).
Im bad at bow in general and honestly its dosent matter how much I play I fail to see all these tactics that everyone talks about. For me its reactiontime, some aim and luck xdxd sometimes I might kill a gold II and sometimes a silver III might kill me.

If noone ever said that archer was a high skillcap ladder, I would honestly think it is a bad ladder with little to no skillcap. At least from my experience
 0
PM Link