Store
Subscribe
Someone explain to me why Cracker is mutable

Kikzo wrote

btw jinxful stop desperately trying to make yourself look smart in front of the younger, less educated badlion community, because you're really not the right person to represent intelligence xd
I'm asking a question, you don't have to be intelligent yourself to look smarter than a lot of people here xd. It seems you can be racist to white people though
 0
PM Link

Pika12X wrote

What a stupid thread
Rasism is bad in all ways
Tell me a time when whites were discriminated because of their skin colour. I am not talking about religion. Just seems something like America would make up, honestly really atupid.
 1
PM Link
@Jinxful Cracker is muted for as it is like saying 'whip cracker'. This is relating back to slavery and white people would whip the slaves. Hence why it is muteable
 1
PM Link

FunkyFactions wrote

Jinxful wrote...



AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAAHHAHHAHSHHAHHAHAAHHAA LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 0
PM Link

Magiclz wrote

@Jinxful Cracker is muted for as it is like saying 'whip cracker'. This is relating back to slavery and white people would whip the slaves. Hence why it is muteable
All I wanted is an answer, cheers for that.

But I will never get annoyed , nor will I have sympathy for people who get offended over being called a "cracker"
 3
PM Link

Jinxful wrote

Magiclz wrote...

All I wanted is an answer, cheers for that.

But I will never get annoyed , nor will I have sympathy for people who get offended over being called a "cracker"


yea it's just used far less than other slurs, i barely ever see it

 0
PM Link

Jinxful wrote

Magiclz wrote...

All I wanted is an answer, cheers for that.

But I will never get annoyed , nor will I have sympathy for people who get offended over being called a "cracker"



http://files.shandymedia.com/images/body/thesavory/RitzRedo.jpg
http://www.clipartkid.com/images/158/equal-sign-clip-art-Pdc2si-clipart.png

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/018/489/nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa.png
 2
PM Link
Wow it's so sexist how there is no international mens' day haha! There's also no White Lives Matter as well. I'm calling racism on this one.
 2
PM Link

FunkyFactions wrote

Jinxful wrote...




omg

http://www.ameriburn.org/verification_verifiedcenters.php
 10
PM Link

FunkyFactions wrote

Jinxful wrote...


IM CRYING
 1
PM Link

FunkyFactions wrote

Jinxful wrote...


 1
PM Link
I'm surprised you're capable of even typing with that kind of logic…

If you were born white, You suck you ignorant fuck!
 0
PM Link
You're supposed to eat Crackers not call people Crackers
 0
PM Link

FunkyFactions wrote

Jinxful wrote...


http://www.wikihow.com/Treat-a-Burn
 1
PM Link
We need a White History month honestly, otherwise there will be no way to bring attention to the global problem of the oppression of Whites
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

Prixy wrote

Well, I guess I will make an attempt to educate you. So when you address the issue of racism never effecting white people, this is not actually true. Much before you were born ( a more pleasant time) people didn't really class themselves as all whites. See in Europe there are different nationalities. Although they may all be from Caucasian descent and have fair skin, they were not grouped as just white. These individual groups faced a lot of oppression. Now im sure there are groups that specifically target all whites but, back then it was mainly focused on one sect (for lack of a better word) of whites. For example if you take a look at post WW2 allied countries, they discriminated against Germans for quite some time. People of German descent are probably classed as white today so, I guess you could say there was in fact discrimination. Another example would be Polish or Italian immigrants. They are white according to standards today but back then they were still separated from the common American. This explains why we have slurs like "polak" or "wop". I think racism was more against a specific race in the broad category of whites, but it wasn't like all fair skinned people were targeted.
You're on about different nationalities which isn't what I'm arguing about
 0
PM Link
Automatically Deleted
 0
PM Link

Prixy wrote

Well, I guess I will make an attempt to educate you. So when you address the issue of racism never effecting white people, this is not actually true. Much before you were born ( a more pleasant time) people didn't really class themselves as all whites. See in Europe there are different nationalities. Although they may all be from Caucasian descent and have fair skin, they were not grouped as just white. These individual groups faced a lot of oppression. Now im sure there are groups that specifically target all whites but, back then it was mainly focused on one sect (for lack of a better word) of whites. For example if you take a look at post WW2 allied countries, they discriminated against Germans for quite some time. People of German descent are probably classed as white today so, I guess you could say there was in fact discrimination. Another example would be Polish or Italian immigrants. They are white according to standards today but back then they were still separated from the common American. This explains why we have slurs like "polak" or "wop". I think racism was more against a specific race in the broad category of whites, but it wasn't like all fair skinned people were targeted.

Shut up tiger
 0
PM Link

Archybot wrote

FunkyFactions wrote...



omg

http://www.ameriburn.org/verification_verifiedcenters.php

I didn't understand
 0
PM Link