Posted on 22 May 2017 - 06:39 AM

Hey this is just a friendly question.
Yesterday i got speed hacked on by 2 guys and they both got banned after some time
The host was a trial so he couldn't ban them before uploading proof.
Why can't trial ban if the hackers are blatantly? Its just a question, no hate toward any staff members =)

Posted on 22 May 2017 - 07:02 AM

I think because cheaters could appeal and plead not guilty and demand for proof ofc if an admin like freekkiller bans them he doesn't need proof for the fact he stayed with network for long time so people trust him but for trial mod or even a mod they have to get proof incase they get called out for it.

Posted on 22 May 2017 - 09:02 AM

The whole point of the trial phase is to teach them how to moderate, detect hacks, and host UHC's (if they are a trial host). They don't have ban perms because they are meant to learn what hacks look like. Yes, a speed hacker is very easy to sport, but we can't just give trials ban perms for very blatant people, otherwise they would have perms to ban non-blatant people. This defeats the purpose of being a trial in the first place.