Join Date: 31 March 2016

Posts: 2264

Posted on 25 October 2017 - 03:46 PM

Bump

Again

PM Link

xIronMatt Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 26 September 2014

Posts: 3304

Posted on 18 December 2017 - 10:34 PM

Bump

PM Link

JuztChicken Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 21 April 2015

Posts: 1937

Posted on 18 December 2017 - 11:40 PM

Noted, thanks for the updates :-D

PM Link

Vuhel Members

Join Date: 04 April 2017

Posts: 578

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 01:54 AM

Noted.

PM Link

Zaquez Members

Join Date: 17 March 2015

Posts: 611

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 02:16 AM

Noted.

PM Link

FunkyFactions Members

Join Date: 25 May 2014

Posts: 5000

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 09:58 AM

This entire “rule” makes no sense. So if we aren’t positive someone is hacking, then we shouldn’t ban mid match, but we still ban them after the match if we aren’t sure? Whether or not a hack is “blatant” means nothing, if you are banning someone you need to be 100% positive they are hacking (regardless of if it is mid match or not).

PM Link

UVpickles Members

Join Date: 27 March 2016

Posts: 6484

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 10:54 AM

FunkyFactions wrote

This entire “rule” makes no sense. So if we aren’t positive someone is hacking, then we shouldn’t ban mid match, but we still ban them after the match if we aren’t sure? Whether or not a hack is “blatant” means nothing, if you are banning someone you need to be 100% positive they are hacking (regardless of if it is mid match or not).

Agreed

PM Link

JackyFTW Members

Join Date: 01 November 2016

Posts: 1212

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 04:51 PM

Noted

PM Link

xIronMatt Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 26 September 2014

Posts: 3304

Posted on 19 December 2017 - 05:56 PM

FunkyFactions wrote

This entire “rule” makes no sense. So if we aren’t positive someone is hacking, then we shouldn’t ban mid match, but we still ban them after the match if we aren’t sure? Whether or not a hack is “blatant” means nothing, if you are banning someone you need to be 100% positive they are hacking (regardless of if it is mid match or not).

Where did I say "if you aren't positive someone is cheating, don't ban mid match"? The words I used were you are allowed to ban mid-match for "blatant hacks" meaning "extremely obvious KA/FF, Speed, Fly, etc". Extremely obvious KA/FF being like someone 7 blocking someone or something crazy like that. The example of any senior looking at it and immediately seeing that the person is cheating came straight from Archy, in an attempt to make the point that it should be extremely obvious to anyone who sees the evidence that the player is cheating.

Let me know if you need anymore clarification or have anymore questions. @FunkyFactions @UVpickles

PM Link

Redex_ Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 19 August 2015

Posts: 2930

Last edited on 19 December 2017 - 06:03 PM by Redex_

FunkyFactions wrote

This entire “rule” makes no sense. So if we aren’t positive someone is hacking, then we shouldn’t ban mid match, but we still ban them after the match if we aren’t sure? Whether or not a hack is “blatant” means nothing, if you are banning someone you need to be 100% positive they are hacking (regardless of if it is mid match or not).

The reason this rule exists is for damage reduction, to reduce the impact of a false ban. If someone is banned mid-match and it is overturned and ruled false, the consequences are much more severe than if they are banned outside of the ranked match.
@UVpickles @FunkyFactions

PM Link