Last edited on 19 June 2017 - 06:42 AM by Vaxd
Bobbles wrote
>

>

>CHeaTerBrek34 iS b3tt34 than LaglionPremium!111!!!!!!!!
>Badlion Premium is far cheaper. There's an option for one-time pay so you're not forced to use the subscription method.
>

>and badlion uses 1 server to get all its players. Not using methods like "sister networks"
But you know what tickles my funny bone? MineHQ players are ready to shit on badlion for its anti-cheat and not selling unbans. But said players are ready to shell out $134.94 if they get banned on Ultra, and they praise the server. So the amount of money you lose from buying unbans on ultra would be $134.94. The amount of money you lose on Arcane; $95 this is excluding unmutes from both servers. But the amount of money you lose for cheating on badlion? None, well you amount of premium time you lose is up for debate but the only thing you lose is time, and that time is spent appealing. Even if you appeal.
> "MineHQ > Badlion"
Don't forget that to get the same features as what Lion had (join uhc up to 20 minutues in, whitelist, specate) you have to spend $199.99 while Lion was $75 for perm ranks and $49.99 a month vs $15 in 30 day ranks.
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 06:50 AM
Vaxd wrote
Bobbles wrote...
Don't forget that to get the same features as what Lion had (join uhc up to 20 minutues in, whitelist, specate) you have to spend $199.99 while Lion was $75 for perm ranks and $49.99 a month vs $15 in 30 day ranks.
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 09:29 AM
Ryankoo1 wrote
only potpvp lol
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 09:31 AM
Bobbles wrote
>

>

>CHeaTerBrek34 iS b3tt34 than LaglionPremium!111!!!!!!!!
>Badlion Premium is far cheaper. There's an option for one-time pay so you're not forced to use the subscription method.
>

>and badlion uses 1 server to get all its players. Not using methods like "sister networks"
But you know what tickles my funny bone? MineHQ players are ready to shit on badlion for its anti-cheat and not selling unbans. But said players are ready to shell out $134.94 if they get banned on Ultra, and they praise the server. So the amount of money you lose from buying unbans on ultra would be $134.94. The amount of money you lose on Arcane; $95 this is excluding unmutes from both servers. But the amount of money you lose for cheating on badlion? None, well you amount of premium time you lose is up for debate but the only thing you lose is time, and that time is spent appealing. Even if you appeal.
> "MineHQ > Badlion"
Tf 250 dollars for a lifetime wtf
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 09:33 AM
Pika12X wrote
Bobbles wrote...
Tf 250 dollars for a lifetime wtf
if I log on I always see like 5 high rollers… jhalt has got it MADE
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 12:08 PM
People will do anything to get money these days :/Posted on 19 June 2017 - 12:15 PM
Pikqchu wrote
Last edited on 19 June 2017 - 12:33 PM by PolkacatLP
Bobbles wrote
"MineHQ > Badlion"
Apexay be like

Last edited on 19 June 2017 - 01:13 PM by OUA
I want to call people stupid for comparing cheatbreaker and badlion premium since they are 2 different things but it's badlion fault for releasing badlion client after premium (or other way around) which made the community really confused. Anyway if you wanna compare something to cheatbreaker compare it to badlion client not premium.Badlion premium is services that have 128tpc and league to make money etc. meanwhile cheatbreak and badlion client are Fps improvement and have anti cheat but only works on their servers and they are both free unlike what @Genocado said and if you want to see which one is better. think what client is available right now and you can play with it.
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 01:55 PM
signss wrote
Officer please don't send him to jail!!! He only robbed the bank and killed 4 people because he's trying to make money!!!!
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 02:13 PM
Minecraft EULA wrote
I'm not encouraging people to do so, but you can report individual servers by reading this https://help.mojang.com/customer/portal/articles/1647288-servers-that-violate-commercial-use-guidelines
Last edited on 19 June 2017 - 03:16 PM by Slypering
I mean it is 100% optional to purchase a donor rank but however, I don't plan to spend over $200+ just to get the best rank out of all the people, lol. I wouldn't even spend that amount of money on a game that isn't real as well tbh.Last edited on 19 June 2017 - 05:59 PM by *deleted-96553
Automatically DeletedLast edited on 19 June 2017 - 06:31 PM by Camdog
Comparing Arcane/Ultra's store prices to Badlion's is humourous. Both Arcane and Ultra are pay to win and play when it comes to SOTW's and ect. You don't get much for what you pay for. But they make it to where the game isn't fun without a rank and where you're left behind. Everyone has a their own opinions on this subject when it comes to over-priced goods. It's smart though, if I were in that position I would be doing the same.https://twitter.com/ArcaneCC/status/876235640765108224
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 06:45 PM
"Cheatbreaker is better than Badlion Premium because Badlion Premium costs money"*goes and spends $250 on in game ranks and $50 for multiple unbans/unmutes*
MineHQ players in a nutshell.
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 07:30 PM
Rozalin wrote
Denied you were cheating.
Indeed, these are frequent.
It's worth remembering, however, that such information is only available as Badlion has one of– if not, the most– transparent appeal system in the PvP community.
Information is always relative. It's easy to see one example, such as Badlion, and make such an assertion. But, when there is a lack of other samples to compare the data to, that assertion loses its value.
I'm not saying that what you said isn't the case, as I emphasized at the beginning of the post.
There are many reasons that these exist and are frequent, and you've heard all about it before on the forums, I'm sure.
Posted on 19 June 2017 - 07:39 PM
Varicks wrote
Rozalin wrote...
Indeed, these are frequent.
It's worth remembering, however, that such information is only available as Badlion has one of– if not, the most– transparent appeal system in the PvP community.
Information is always relative. It's easy to see one example, such as Badlion, and make such an assertion. But, when there is a lack of other samples to compare the data to, that assertion loses its value.
I'm not saying that what you said isn't the case, as I emphasized at the beginning of the post.
There are many reasons that these exist and are frequent, and you've heard all about it before on the forums, I'm sure.
Don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with how Badlion handles appeals. At least Badlion doesn't sell pardons.
I think the system is as good as it can be for now.