Subscribe
Trump rant
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 01:39 PM
Louiie wrote
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 02:19 PM
I just want to play minecraft.Posted on 17 August 2017 - 03:27 PM
Trump is the best president whether you like it or not. Standing in the middle of roads trying to make him resign does nothing just proves that you lack brain cells and need to be exterminated.Last edited on 17 August 2017 - 03:31 PM by xausten
UNSIGHTEDREBORN wrote
I don't live in America but from what I can see already online you guys have a really idiotic society. There is a shitload of racism, both from white AND black people, and Americas extreme liberals would rather riot in the streets and block roads for the sake of letting everyone know that they don't like having a penis/vagina. Donald Trump has taken on the role of the president of a country with an EXTREMELY fucked up society, and he's getting hate from all sides. He's not the right person to lead America, that's for sure. However, I think that the people who scream in the streets calling for his death don't actually know the full story behind what he's having to deal with. The mainstream media in America is undoubtedly very liberal and biased, and unfortunately Americans find it easier to just tune into CNN (without a doubt the most fake and cancerously biased channel in America) instead of doing their own research on what Donald Trump is actually doing. He's not a good person, he's probably got some racist thoughts, but the media fucking demonizes him, they make it seem like he's doing much worse things.
Regarding Trumps transgender military ban which triggered trannies and liberals worldwide, do you HONESTLY think that it's a good idea to put high class weapons, bombs, guns, rocket-launchers etc into the hands of a group of people who have a FOURTY PERCENT attempted suicide rate? Really? On top of that, many transgender people have seriously damaged and weakened their bodies already through unnatural and ongoing hormone treatment, body mods etc. America needs its strongest people defending its country, this is where political correctness has gone too far. Weakening the line of a countries defense for the sake of being politically correct is NOT ok. Trumps decision on this is something I strongly agree on. Apart from that, I feel like he doesn't think about what his country needs and pursues his own wishes.
Regarding Trumps transgender military ban which triggered trannies and liberals worldwide, do you HONESTLY think that it's a good idea to put high class weapons, bombs, guns, rocket-launchers etc into the hands of a group of people who have a FOURTY PERCENT attempted suicide rate? Really? On top of that, many transgender people have seriously damaged and weakened their bodies already through unnatural and ongoing hormone treatment, body mods etc. America needs its strongest people defending its country, this is where political correctness has gone too far. Weakening the line of a countries defense for the sake of being politically correct is NOT ok. Trumps decision on this is something I strongly agree on. Apart from that, I feel like he doesn't think about what his country needs and pursues his own wishes.
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 03:36 PM
oh boyPosted on 17 August 2017 - 04:06 PM
Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.Last edited on 17 August 2017 - 04:38 PM by iSluff
Bladian wrote
Keep out latinos? What the fuck are you 12?
He wants to keep out illegal immigrants, and since I don't think you know anything about economics here's some basic shit.
More illegal immigrants = less jobs for Americans = more unemployment = more trouble.
He doesn't give a fuck about where people are from, but you either come in legally or you stay out.
How can someone be so condescending and so uninformed simultaneously? You just said someone is ignorant on economics and then immediately pulled out the lump of labor fallacy.
Immigration stimulates the economy and creates more jobs. There is an economic consensus on this. Economists agree that you're straight up wrong. https://i.gyazo.com/f3d048ae3a6785ff811abf67b19d3e9f.png https://i.gyazo.com/73df01e3d25a2a0b3b48b814924c112b.png
You know what would solve the problem of illegal immigration? Getting rid of the majority of our laws that restrict immigration and only preventing people who are dangerous from entering the country, rather than keeping all these nonsense laws against economic immigrants that both the average citizen and the immigrants themselves benefit from.
Bladian wrote
Source? All the sexual assaults charges against him have been dropped for lack of evidence.
If you're talking about "grab her by the pussy," if you listened to the whole conversation he says "they let him", meaning he has their consent.
Either way I'm not a fan of this conversation, but still get your facts right.
Trump has a position of power over these women, which means that they're unlikely to object even if they do not consent. "Letting" someone do something is not necessarily consent. In fact the word often has a connotation of not being enthusiastic about it. This is an extreme example, but if someone points a gun to your head and touches you sexually, and you don't do anything, that doesn't mean you consent. This is a similar situation on a less extreme scale. If your boss does something you don't consent to, you might not vocalize it in fear of consequences. Trump definitely DOESN'T have implied consent with these people, sooo…
Bladian wrote
Oh dear god, the so called Muslim ban.
1) It was a ban from countries which had the highest amount of terrorist attacks
2) It so happened that the religion was Islam
3) It wasn't a Muslim ban, it was a terrorist ban if anything
He called it a Muslim ban at first, and then backtracked and banned Muslim dominated countries so that it wouldn't be unconstitutional. It's clear the intention was a Muslim ban especially considering that's literally what he said at first, and then had to change it so that it could actually be legal.
Bladian wrote
1) Hillary was an utterly shit politican (Benghazi)
2) Hillary had ties with Saudi Arabia
3) Hillary helped a child molester win a case
4) Hillary was not a woman supporter, their was a tape of her laughing about the man she had helped escape the accusation
5) 30,000 deleted emails
1. Tell me what evidence you have of wrongdoing on Benghazi from hillary without googling it
2. If a terrible person gives you charity money will you refuse to take it?
3. This is by far the fucking dumbest common criticism of hillary clinton. She was a fucking public defender. Do you know what public defenders do? Do you know why it's valuable for the public defenders in our justice system to try to win cases? Do you want our country to not give the best defense possible to people accused of crimes? Do you want to scrap the justice system and just throw the accused in prison? This argument pisses me off every goddamn time I see it. It's just so unbelievably stupid.
4. Oh big fucking deal she said she didn't think the guy was telling the truth but she gave the best defense she could regardless because she values our justice system.
5. https://i.imgur.com//O0UjOJZ.png
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 04:23 PM
im a registered republican (although i consider myself a libertarian who leans more left every day) and i do not like this manPosted on 17 August 2017 - 04:26 PM
@Kimojiiiiii you have a lot of haters holy (͡◔ ͜ʖ ͡◔)Last edited on 17 August 2017 - 05:21 PM by *deleted-88860
Automatically DeletedPosted on 17 August 2017 - 05:38 PM
I expected a better threadLast edited on 17 August 2017 - 05:59 PM by iSluff
Bladian wrote
Ooooo boy am I going to have fun.
Immigration stimulates the economy and creates more jobs. There is an economic consensus on this. Economists agree that you're straight up wrong. https://i.gyazo.com/f3d048ae3a6785ff811abf67b19d3e9f.png https://i.gyazo.com/73df01e3d25a2a0b3b48b814924c112b.png
This would be correct, unfortunately you didn't actually spend time to actually read what I had written.
Illegal Immigration causes a lot more cons then pros.
"Illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a year at the federal, state and local level… The annual outlay that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers is an average amount per native-headed household of $1,117… Education for the children of illegal aliens constitutes the single largest cost to taxpayers, at an annual price tag of nearly $52 billion…
I have no issue with legal immigrants but since you didn't spend more than 30 seconds reading what I had written, you didn't see that illegal immigration is actually a burden to society.
Of course having more people (up to a certain point) is good for the economy of a country, as it can raise taxes, create more jobs, etc…. but with undocumented illegal immigrants it's a whole other matter.
Trump has a position of power over these women, which means that they're unlikely to object even if they do not consent. "Letting" someone do something is not necessarily consent. In fact the word often has a connotation of not being enthusiastic about it. This is an extreme example, but if someone points a gun to your head and touches you sexually, and you don't do anything, that doesn't mean you consent. This is a similar situation on a less extreme scale. If your boss does something you don't consent to, you might not vocalize it in fear of consequences. Trump definitely DOESN'T have implied consent with these people, sooo…
Again I don't agree on what he said.
I'll see your point here, but I'll debunk it anyways.
Lets start off with the point that all his sexual harassment lawsuits have been proven to be bullshit, and have been dropped.
The gun metaphor was horrible, and useless in this case.
As far as I know, none of these women worked for him, or had anything to do with him, meaning that they could have easily said no, or could have fucked off. If they let him do it at that point, it's considered consent, because trust me kid… when people don't say no, when someone has nothing over them, it means it's consent.
He called it a Muslim ban at first, and then backtracked and banned Muslim dominated countries so that it wouldn't be unconstitutional. It's clear the intention was a Muslim ban especially considering that's literally what he said at first, and then had to change it so that it could actually be legal.
I'll have to double check on this but 95% sure that the so called "Muslim Ban," was a name given by the media.
The intention wasn't a Muslim Ban, (even though I've read the Quran and it's quite disgusting), the intention was a ban on countries which had the highest amount of terrorist attacks committed.
Whether or not this was the best choice, I have no clue, but if you think that it was a racial/religion ban, you're just naive.
1. Tell me what evidence you have of wrongdoing on Benghazi from hillary without googling it
2. If a terrible person gives you charity money will you refuse to take it?
3. This is by far the fucking dumbest common criticism of hillary clinton. She was a fucking public defender. Do you know what public defenders do? Do you know why it's valuable for the public defenders in our justice system to try to win cases? Do you want our country to not give the best defense possible to people accused of crimes? Do you want to scrap the justice system and just throw the accused in prison? This argument pisses me off every goddamn time I see it. It's just so unbelievably stupid.
4. Oh big fucking deal she said she didn't think the guy was telling the truth but she gave the best defense she could regardless because she values our justice system.
5. https://i.imgur.com//O0UjOJZ.png
1) Without googling, what I remember is her responsibility for the death of a few navy seals
2) Are you fucking kidding me, charity money. Take a second and realise that's not how it works. The whole point of receiving financial aid from Saudi Arabia, is so that they may keep closer relations between the 2 countries, such as lower taxation on exports and imports, etc…..
3+4) You know what I have no problem with her being a public defender, if you've seen the movie "Bridge of Spies", it's her simply doing her job.
But what I can't stand is this shit here.
Tell me you don't find it morally disgusting that this woman is laughing at how a child molester got away with such a fuck-all sentence.
If she had protected him fine, but the laugh is just fucking horrible.
5) The problem wasn't what were on her emails, the problem was that she had fucking deleted 30,000 emails from a private server.
What if there was crucial information in that, you don't find it worrying that a woman of her political status could commit such a huge fucking error.
@iSluff
Immigration stimulates the economy and creates more jobs. There is an economic consensus on this. Economists agree that you're straight up wrong. https://i.gyazo.com/f3d048ae3a6785ff811abf67b19d3e9f.png https://i.gyazo.com/73df01e3d25a2a0b3b48b814924c112b.png
This would be correct, unfortunately you didn't actually spend time to actually read what I had written.
Illegal Immigration causes a lot more cons then pros.
"Illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a year at the federal, state and local level… The annual outlay that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers is an average amount per native-headed household of $1,117… Education for the children of illegal aliens constitutes the single largest cost to taxpayers, at an annual price tag of nearly $52 billion…
I have no issue with legal immigrants but since you didn't spend more than 30 seconds reading what I had written, you didn't see that illegal immigration is actually a burden to society.
Of course having more people (up to a certain point) is good for the economy of a country, as it can raise taxes, create more jobs, etc…. but with undocumented illegal immigrants it's a whole other matter.
Trump has a position of power over these women, which means that they're unlikely to object even if they do not consent. "Letting" someone do something is not necessarily consent. In fact the word often has a connotation of not being enthusiastic about it. This is an extreme example, but if someone points a gun to your head and touches you sexually, and you don't do anything, that doesn't mean you consent. This is a similar situation on a less extreme scale. If your boss does something you don't consent to, you might not vocalize it in fear of consequences. Trump definitely DOESN'T have implied consent with these people, sooo…
Again I don't agree on what he said.
I'll see your point here, but I'll debunk it anyways.
Lets start off with the point that all his sexual harassment lawsuits have been proven to be bullshit, and have been dropped.
The gun metaphor was horrible, and useless in this case.
As far as I know, none of these women worked for him, or had anything to do with him, meaning that they could have easily said no, or could have fucked off. If they let him do it at that point, it's considered consent, because trust me kid… when people don't say no, when someone has nothing over them, it means it's consent.
He called it a Muslim ban at first, and then backtracked and banned Muslim dominated countries so that it wouldn't be unconstitutional. It's clear the intention was a Muslim ban especially considering that's literally what he said at first, and then had to change it so that it could actually be legal.
I'll have to double check on this but 95% sure that the so called "Muslim Ban," was a name given by the media.
The intention wasn't a Muslim Ban, (even though I've read the Quran and it's quite disgusting), the intention was a ban on countries which had the highest amount of terrorist attacks committed.
Whether or not this was the best choice, I have no clue, but if you think that it was a racial/religion ban, you're just naive.
1. Tell me what evidence you have of wrongdoing on Benghazi from hillary without googling it
2. If a terrible person gives you charity money will you refuse to take it?
3. This is by far the fucking dumbest common criticism of hillary clinton. She was a fucking public defender. Do you know what public defenders do? Do you know why it's valuable for the public defenders in our justice system to try to win cases? Do you want our country to not give the best defense possible to people accused of crimes? Do you want to scrap the justice system and just throw the accused in prison? This argument pisses me off every goddamn time I see it. It's just so unbelievably stupid.
4. Oh big fucking deal she said she didn't think the guy was telling the truth but she gave the best defense she could regardless because she values our justice system.
5. https://i.imgur.com//O0UjOJZ.png
1) Without googling, what I remember is her responsibility for the death of a few navy seals
2) Are you fucking kidding me, charity money. Take a second and realise that's not how it works. The whole point of receiving financial aid from Saudi Arabia, is so that they may keep closer relations between the 2 countries, such as lower taxation on exports and imports, etc…..
3+4) You know what I have no problem with her being a public defender, if you've seen the movie "Bridge of Spies", it's her simply doing her job.
But what I can't stand is this shit here.
Tell me you don't find it morally disgusting that this woman is laughing at how a child molester got away with such a fuck-all sentence.
If she had protected him fine, but the laugh is just fucking horrible.
5) The problem wasn't what were on her emails, the problem was that she had fucking deleted 30,000 emails from a private server.
What if there was crucial information in that, you don't find it worrying that a woman of her political status could commit such a huge fucking error.
@iSluff
>Accusing me of not reading when you're apparently completely incapable of comprehending what I'm saying.
Being against illegal economic immigration means you want laws against economic immigration. It's like banning all legal immigration, and then saying "I have no problem with legal immigrants, just illegal ones!"
Trump supports the status quo laws against economic immigration, and even wants to expand them. That's the problem and that's the policy that goes against all professional economic consensus, and that's the policy you're defending when you're "against illegal immigration."
Also:
“Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on.”
"Without googling, what I remember is her responsibility for the death of a few navy seals"
What did she do or not do to cause that?
"As far as I know, none of these women worked for him, or had anything to do with him, meaning that they could have easily said no, or could have fucked off. If they let him do it at that point, it's considered consent, because trust me kid… when people don't say no, when someone has nothing over them, it means it's consent. "
I don't think this is the road you want to go down, unless you think he's randomly pussy grabbing on the streets LMAO. Obviously it's women he knew, and most people he knows he has power over.
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 06:40 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 17 August 2017 - 06:43 PM
http://prntscr.com/g9u1b1Posted on 17 August 2017 - 07:26 PM
KingBooger wrote
why cant we have bernie?!??!???
he good president xd
he good president xd
Hell no
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 07:28 PM
Imo, Trump is a shit president. But there's nothing we can do now unfortunatelyPosted on 17 August 2017 - 07:35 PM
Comey getting fired actually does have an influence on the investagation. It might not seem like it, but there is. For example, since Trump has specifically told the new director to get him out of this, the new director will do it in an secretive way where no one will notice it. For example, if there were 20 people working on the case, he would remove a couple, which will slow down the process. So Comey firing will have an affect. I do not like Trump, but I also do not like hillary. I wish we had someone else beside the 2, I mean they both are horrible, we needed someone like Obama to run again. NOT RETARDED TRUMP OR EMAIL IDIOT HILLARY.Posted on 17 August 2017 - 07:36 PM
ryan2003222 wrote
Comey getting fired actually does have an influence on the investagation. It might not seem like it, but there is. For example, since Trump has specifically told the new director to get him out of this, the new director will do it in an secretive way where no one will notice it. For example, if there were 20 people working on the case, he would remove a couple, which will slow down the process. So Comey firing will have an affect. I do not like Trump, but I also do not like hillary. I wish we had someone else beside the 2, I mean they both are horrible, we needed someone like Obama to run again. NOT RETARDED TRUMP OR EMAIL IDIOT HILLARY.
Last edited on 17 August 2017 - 09:37 PM by Big_Loink
1. Several of your points are opinions, not facts.2. He is trying to byild a wall to keep illegal immigrants out, not latinos.
3. He is trying to ban residents of countries where terrorism is most prominenet, not Muslims.
4. Everything is really over exaggerated.
Other than that I agree.
Posted on 17 August 2017 - 10:26 PM
I really hate the electoral college more Americans voted for Hillary but Donald trump won because he racked up small states. I don't know how anyone can justify this system. If this system continues to be implemented Democrats will definitely get screwed in upcoming elections.ps I don't like Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump I just think that the electoral college is a stupid system.
Thread is locked