Posted on 15 January 2018 - 06:09 PM
Razerzone wrote
Luk3 wrote...
what kind of comparison is that
I don’t know how to make what I just said simpler.
Posted on 15 January 2018 - 06:09 PM
Realidad wrote
Wow thanks dude! This is really going to help me improve on this idea!
Posted on 16 January 2018 - 04:18 AM
Luk3 wrote
Realidad wrote...
Wow thanks dude! This is really going to help me improve on this idea!
1. You never asked for feedback to improve "your" idea
2. No need to be sarcastic and condescending either.
Posted on 16 January 2018 - 05:40 PM
Vaxd wrote
Luk3 wrote...
1. You never asked for feedback to improve "your" idea
2. No need to be sarcastic and condescending either.
Why would I need to ask that’s just a normal thing to do? Saying “neutral” is a pointless response and an obvious way to as previously said, farm posts, this idea was mine I’m sorry if this was made previously I am not active on the forums every day this is my first time logging on in 11 months and sarcasm is the right response for someone who posts something stupid like that
Posted on 16 January 2018 - 10:36 PM
Luk3 wrote
Vaxd wrote...
Why would I need to ask that’s just a normal thing to do? Saying “neutral” is a pointless response and an obvious way to as previously said, farm posts, this idea was mine I’m sorry if this was made previously I am not active on the forums every day this is my first time logging on in 11 months and sarcasm is the right response for someone who posts something stupid like that
Saying neutral isn't a pointless response and it's idiotic to think so lmao.
"No. Neutral means it has both positive and negative aspects. There is a huge difference between a post that only gets +1s and a post that gets half +1s and half Neutrals. To me, it helps gauge the interest in a suggestion. I do however support explaining why you +1 or -1 or neutral since it helps. +1s are typically just agreeing so explanations aren't as necessary but I think that if you -1 or neutral with an opinion someone hasn't already explained, you should explain as to why you said that." From metarus
Posted on 17 January 2018 - 01:16 AM
Vaxd wrote
Luk3 wrote...
Saying neutral isn't a pointless response and it's idiotic to think so lmao.
"No. Neutral means it has both positive and negative aspects. There is a huge difference between a post that only gets +1s and a post that gets half +1s and half Neutrals. To me, it helps gauge the interest in a suggestion. I do however support explaining why you +1 or -1 or neutral since it helps. +1s are typically just agreeing so explanations aren't as necessary but I think that if you -1 or neutral with an opinion someone hasn't already explained, you should explain as to why you said that." From metarus
If you’re going to write something like neutral, which is stupid the least you can do is provide reasoning, an explanation and criticism. Actually have a think of that. Honestly if you are going to write neutral without an explanation there’s no point of replying to a thread unless it’s to farm posts.
Posted on 17 January 2018 - 03:22 AM
Luk3 wrote
Vaxd wrote...
If you’re going to write something like neutral, which is stupid the least you can do is provide reasoning, an explanation and criticism. Actually have a think of that. Honestly if you are going to write neutral without an explanation there’s no point of replying to a thread unless it’s to farm posts.
Not true at all
Posted on 17 January 2018 - 03:49 AM
Vaxd wrote
Luk3 wrote...
Not true at all
Give me 3 reasons why people reply with neutral without an explanation then