Last edited on 06 February 2018 - 02:49 PM by EnanoSalvaje
Mistery #1Today guys something amazing happend Purox get unbanned
So.. It was a false ban? It was a social experiment? Idk is a Mistery
Comment your theories
https://gyazo.com/d31f577094174511e4ffb109f88a0ad1
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 03:18 PM
Yes, I saw him in-game today. Im not sure but I think that it was a false ban.Posted on 06 February 2018 - 03:48 PM
Jesus, that actually makes Badlion look really bad. If they put that little care into banning a SENIOR STAFF MEMBER for cheating, just imagine all the other shit that happens every judgement day.Let's hold a moment of silence for all of the other regular players who got falsely JD'd, but will get instantly denied by a senior and will never have an admin look into their case because they aren't known. FeelsBadMan
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 04:10 PM
FunkyFactions wrote
Let's hold a moment of silence for all of the other regular players who got falsely JD'd, but will get instantly denied by a senior and will never have an admin look into their case because they aren't known. FeelsBadMan
If this was the case, I agree. It would be an embarrassment.
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 04:14 PM
FunkyFactions wrote
Let's hold a moment of silence for all of the other regular players who got falsely JD'd, but will get instantly denied by a senior and will never have an admin look into their case because they aren't known. FeelsBadMan
But GCheat is 99.9% accurate?!?!?
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 04:18 PM
I don't think this thread will end well.Last edited on 06 February 2018 - 04:32 PM by Archybot
Wasn't false, he did indeed cheat but he didn't know. We went through his history of modpacks and found one of the modpacks he downloaded from a YT video had an edited mod with reach/misplace in it, and when he had reformatted his computer he downloaded a different modpack that didn't have an edited mod, which matches his logs perfectly. We did an admin vote and he got unbanned/reinstated.Ban was not false, we just decided to give him the benefit of the doubt, as we do to several people. There has yet to be a case of an inaccurate ban so far this JD.
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 05:35 PM
Archybot wrote
Ban was not false, we just decided to give him the benefit of the doubt, as we do to several people. There has yet to be a case of an inaccurate ban so far this JD.
Ok :) thanks for the explanation every one have a new opportunity and more if it was a mistake
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 05:36 PM
cringiecake wrote
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 05:39 PM
FunkyFactions wrote
Let's hold a moment of silence for all of the other regular players who got falsely JD'd, but will get instantly denied by a senior and will never have an admin look into their case because they aren't known. FeelsBadMan
Ye the reality dude
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 05:39 PM
Archybot wrote
Ban was not false, we just decided to give him the benefit of the doubt, as we do to several people. There has yet to be a case of an inaccurate ban so far this JD.
Close the thread
Posted on 06 February 2018 - 05:41 PM
Locking as requested