Posted on 15 February 2018 - 06:20 AM
This is true i played against a 1300 he toggled 6 blocks and didnt get banned LOL. i mean hes banned now but still i lost -32Posted on 15 February 2018 - 06:34 AM
DaddyKeerqq wrote
sewl wrote...
Why u answer all my answers, u have problem some?
If u wanna know his problem, look in the mirror, it shall say the answer
Posted on 15 February 2018 - 07:44 AM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 15 February 2018 - 12:47 PM
EhhThing wrote
BAC
Posted on 15 February 2018 - 01:37 PM
Pika12X wrote
EhhThing wrote...
BAC
Posted on 15 February 2018 - 04:51 PM
EhhThing wrote
Dude why all mods say that lol? It`s not point to just say Gcheat is better then all other anticheats (and yes that is true) but I said this because It needs improve -.-"
Last edited on 15 February 2018 - 10:04 PM by *deleted-191881
Automatically DeletedLast edited on 16 February 2018 - 08:08 PM by iSmileZ
ScrubV2 wrote
This guy plays 2 games, yea he is clearly cheating to a human, but for a machine that has to take into account there could be lag etc. he simply did not play enough to be banned by GCheat I'd assume.
As someone who actually sees players being banned when watching them for hacks myself on multiple occasions it is fair to say it does the job pretty well. The dude is banned now. To say something sucks off of one case where he got away for a little bit is ridiculous.
It is server side, any decent cheat developer should be able to get by something that runs on 20tps and can only judge from packet input.
Mind that GCheat should have banned 40.000 cheaters instead of 20.000, that's why it sucks.
Last edited on 16 February 2018 - 08:59 PM by Asorn
Existencia wrote
ScrubV2 wrote...
Mind that GCheat should have banned 40.000 cheaters instead of 20.000, that's why it sucks.
Posted on 16 February 2018 - 09:11 PM
Asorn wrote
Existencia wrote...
I meant that GCheat should have banned much more players that cheated and didn't get banned.
Last edited on 16 February 2018 - 09:27 PM by Asorn
Existencia wrote
Asorn wrote...
I meant that GCheat should have banned much more players that cheated and didn't get banned.
If you think gcheat "sucks" so much why don't you create a better anticheat.
If you can't do that atleast name one anticheat which is better than gcheat and can boast as high ban counts as gcheat's with a similar playerbase to Badlion's. Take all the time you want but you won't find one.
Posted on 17 February 2018 - 03:26 AM
Existencia wrote
Asorn wrote...
I meant that GCheat should have banned much more players that cheated and didn't get banned.
Name 20,000 more cheaters, hell name 100 that weren't banned. (PvP cheats) I'll wait
Posted on 17 February 2018 - 08:38 AM
Vape lite will bypass jd if u get the settings right pixelclicker with 9-20 cps 3 jitter bypassed my friend DREAMER_440 used it then he got v4pe on n used 5 blocc reach with combo mode got a combo then a reach hit n ban ripLast edited on 17 February 2018 - 08:40 AM by ThunderYourOld
.Last edited on 17 February 2018 - 09:09 AM by Asorn
BestInPoland wrote
Posted on 17 February 2018 - 03:13 PM
Rands to me idk who they are.DREAMER_440 bypassed with a 10-14 cps clicker and that worries me a bit.
Last edited on 18 February 2018 - 07:53 AM by ItsExplicit
I'm sure that gcheat has no reach check, he was prob detected for autoclicking or velocity. But it's for sure better then guardian l0l where those dumbos can't detect packet spammingEhhThing wrote
Firefly, Atlas/Delta, AntiGamingChair and DotLegit
Posted on 18 February 2018 - 07:55 AM
explicit_exe wrote
EhhThing wrote...
Firefly, Atlas/Delta, AntiGamingChair and DotLegit
AntiGamingChair l o l
Posted on 18 February 2018 - 07:56 AM
Vaxd wrote
explicit_exe wrote...
AntiGamingChair l o l
Yeah what? It detects 3.1 reach while gcheat has no reach check and guardian detects only 3.4
Posted on 18 February 2018 - 08:03 AM
explicit_exe wrote
Vaxd wrote...
Yeah what? It detects 3.1 reach while gcheat has no reach check and guardian detects only 3.4
l o l