Posted on 14 March 2018 - 06:19 AM
Lol the dude is good in build but he's not good in archer and he's not THAT good in no debuff. (He's good don't get me wrong). See this is the problem with having only three kit counting for global… Idk who is the dumbass who thought it was a good idea but like wake up idiot.Posted on 14 March 2018 - 07:59 AM
yeahPosted on 14 March 2018 - 10:06 AM
+1 lolPosted on 14 March 2018 - 10:26 AM
churupan wrote
yea 3 kits doesn't represent a lot of skill, however, last season most of the top global players were Bow players tbh and most of them are garbage at melee lol. Being good at bow in the previous seasons made it easier to get a high global elo if compared to being good at melee, as bow fights are typically much shorter and the biggest part is that they do not have to deal with the hackers that high elo melee players have to deal with on a daily basis which makes getting a high elo in a bow ladder MUCH easier then getting high elo in a melee ladder.
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 10:49 AM
Bean wrote
churupan wrote...
yea 3 kits doesn't represent a lot of skill, however, last season most of the top global players were Bow players tbh and most of them are garbage at melee lol. Being good at bow in the previous seasons made it easier to get a high global elo if compared to being good at melee, as bow fights are typically much shorter and the biggest part is that they do not have to deal with the hackers that high elo melee players have to deal with on a daily basis which makes getting a high elo in a bow ladder MUCH easier then getting high elo in a melee ladder.
Bow kits are a minority compared to melee kits so its much more beneficial to be good at melee than bow to be high elo. Also bow fights definetly take longer than sword fights. I assume you are referring to me when you say "bow player and garbage at melee" we can fight when badlion fixes their kb and you will see if im bad or not lmao
Last edited on 14 March 2018 - 11:09 AM by BeanBANK
-Last edited on 14 March 2018 - 11:13 AM by Bean
Radioactivebeans wrote
Bean wrote...
Bow kits are a minority compared to melee kits so its much more beneficial to be good at melee than bow to be high elo. Also bow fights definetly take longer than sword fights. I assume you are referring to me when you say "bow player and garbage at melee" we can fight when badlion fixes their kb and you will see if im bad or not lmao
I am not referring to you lol, bow players just have a advantage in grinding elo as they do not face hackers which is literally such a advantage, and no not all bow players suck at melee just most of them.
Ill just give you an example, the highest archer elo player last season was 2550 or something, the highest nodebuff player was 2250, but more players play nodebuff so why is it easier to have a higher elo in archer then nodebuff? The pure reason is cheaters.
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 11:24 AM
Bean wrote
Radioactivebeans wrote...
I am not referring to you lol, bow players just have a advantage in grinding elo as they do not face hackers which is literally such a advantage, and no not all bow players suck at melee just most of them.
Ill just give you an example, the highest archer elo player last season was 2550 or something, the highest nodebuff player was 2250, but more players play nodebuff so why is it easier to have a higher elo in archer then nodebuff? The pure reason is cheaters.
There are a number of factors that you have to consider when deciding if a ladder is easier to get high elo than others. For example how many players play the ladder (inflation) or the design of the kit if it has a luck factor in it or the amount of cheaters in it and the time it takes to finish a match. Iron for example isn’t played very much and is also based around arrow conserving which makes the ladder a lot harder to grind and a lot harder for the better player to win. Every single kit other than archer, uhc and iron is based around mainly melee that is why its a minority and that is why its not a big advantage. If you want to talk about nodebuff vs archer then yes there are more cheaters in nodebuff but the number 1 nodebuff player ranks 14th in the global leaderboards when the number 1 archer player ranks 79th
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 12:24 PM
@Bean also I would like to know who you were referring to because baker is the only bow playerin top 10 globalPosted on 14 March 2018 - 12:29 PM
Bean wrote
Radioactivebeans wrote...
I am not referring to you lol, bow players just have a advantage in grinding elo as they do not face hackers which is literally such a advantage, and no not all bow players suck at melee just most of them.
Ill just give you an example, the highest archer elo player last season was 2550 or something, the highest nodebuff player was 2250, but more players play nodebuff so why is it easier to have a higher elo in archer then nodebuff? The pure reason is cheaters.
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 12:36 PM
+11111111111111111111111111111111!Posted on 14 March 2018 - 01:47 PM
-1Maybe he's not that good in NoDebuff and Archer, but if u're actually the best melee player, and u're really good in the other kits, I think it's better then being 1st just for bow skills instead of melee and other
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 02:58 PM
+1Posted on 14 March 2018 - 03:01 PM
No idea why something like this was changed without consulting the player-base first anyways…+1
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 03:04 PM
@churupan https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/208852 That is my opinion on how it should work.Posted on 14 March 2018 - 03:18 PM
Mqrzio wrote
Maybe he's not that good in NoDebuff and Archer, but if u're actually the best melee player, and u're really good in the other kits, I think it's better then being 1st just for bow skills instead of melee and other
Poor guy
Posted on 14 March 2018 - 04:45 PM
+1 no one likes it and idk why it hasn't been changed yetPosted on 14 March 2018 - 05:02 PM
+1Posted on 14 March 2018 - 05:17 PM
+1Posted on 14 March 2018 - 08:02 PM
I like this 3 kits for being global just because:1) It don`t takes to much time to get to lb
2) You can be good in one/two kits and still get good global
I personally like more kits for global, but its much harder to get elo then now.
+1