Posted on 08 April 2015 - 08:08 PM
BurntCactus wrote
I have zero respect for a lot of people, but talking shit about them just for the sake of talking shit is toxicity at its worst. Just because you lose respect for somebody doesn't mean you have to lose respect for basic societal norms to not harass him about it. I took the same stance at Judgement Day 1 when insanegguy and Dualzz were banned. Little has changed.
tylarzz wrote
also @iguim28
Pippiter admitted to cheating, and I find it utter bullshit that he can go around and claim that he admitted out of "panic." He says in the video, "I talked to some of my mod friends, and they said the best thing to do was just admit to it because I would get a shorter ban time anyway." That is a flat-out lie. He was mod for how long? And he doesn't know the basics of appealing? And anyway, pretending to admit to hacking is the stupidest shit a person can do. I think he is trying to cover up the fact that he had hacks on by writing us a very convenient story. I've known Pippiter for a while, and I'm positive this isn't something he would do.
Anyway, if what he's saying in the video is true, he's trying to game the appeal system, and that's gonna lead him to never getting appealed, ever. @MasterGberry Maybe you would like to look into this?
@Tylarzz @BurntCactus
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 08:23 PM
Hivlik wrote
BurntCactus wrote...
I have zero respect for a lot of people, but talking shit about them just for the sake of talking shit is toxicity at its worst. Just because you lose respect for somebody doesn't mean you have to lose respect for basic societal norms to not harass him about it. I took the same stance at Judgement Day 1 when insanegguy and Dualzz were banned. Little has changed.
tylarzz wrote...
also @iguim28
Pippiter admitted to cheating, and I find it utter bullshit that he can go around and claim that he admitted out of "panic." He says in the video, "I talked to some of my mod friends, and they said the best thing to do was just admit to it because I would get a shorter ban time anyway." That is a flat-out lie. He was mod for how long? And he doesn't know the basics of appealing? And anyway, pretending to admit to hacking is the stupidest shit a person can do. I think he is trying to cover up the fact that he had hacks on by writing us a very convenient story. I've known Pippiter for a while, and I'm positive this isn't something he would do.
Anyway, if what he's saying in the video is true, he's trying to game the appeal system, and that's gonna lead him to never getting appealed, ever. @MasterGberry Maybe you would like to look into this?
@Tylarzz @BurntCactus
Hivlik knows
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 08:38 PM
guy knows what's upPosted on 08 April 2015 - 08:50 PM
@BetterSprint speaks of Pippiter being a toxin yet has 30+ mutes on his main alone. l.m.a.o.Posted on 08 April 2015 - 08:50 PM
double snipPosted on 08 April 2015 - 09:01 PM
1. You shouldn't lose all your respect for a PERSON just because they "hacked" in a video game.2. You shouldn't show negativity towards a person just because you don't respect them.
3. People need to grow up, I personally don't believe he hacked but I do think he should stay banned because of the lack of evidence. GCheat bans more people correctly than falsely and if they don't have proper evidence then it's really just a messed up situation for both sides, and the server benefits more if it rids itself of hackers but every once in a while makes a mistake.
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:04 PM
Kansas wrote
2. You shouldn't show negativity towards a person just because you don't respect them.
3. People need to grow up, I personally don't believe he hacked but I do think he should stay banned because of the lack of evidence. GCheat bans more people correctly than falsely and if they don't have proper evidence then it's really just a messed up situation for both sides, and the server benefits more if it rids itself of hackers but every once in a while makes a mistake.
The fact that you're a mod…
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:20 PM
redpanda99 wrote
Kansas wrote...
The fact that you're a mod…
I've also known pip for far longer than I've known that this server even existed and even if GCheat had been 100% accurate in the past I would still find it hard to believe he would hack.
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:38 PM
———-WARNING————Don't go into the comments section on pippiters video, you will contract immediate cancer
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:47 PM
Kansas wrote
2. You shouldn't show negativity towards a person just because you don't respect them.
You are in no position to say that. I have my opinions, you have yours.
Kansas wrote
This is your mistake. You're a mod for Badlion, have you no shame in saying that? When you're given mod, you're not allowed to say stuff like that. Unfortunately, you have to put the server before your opinions when you apply for mod. Saying that Pippiter didn't hack like that is out of line.
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:48 PM
Kev wrote
Oh really? These are spread out over a year, and this isn't my main, Sprint is.
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:58 PM
This thread is all toxic, imo this thread should be locked.Posted on 08 April 2015 - 09:58 PM
Agentmeade123 wrote
yeah +1
Posted on 08 April 2015 - 10:03 PM
Locked.Posted on 08 April 2015 - 10:09 PM
I'm reopening this real fast to post thisKauwai wrote
Although Pip got banned by G-Cheat, who's to say that its 100% accurate? In fact, he was in a bow fight when he was banned, if the match post was still there it would be that his sword was not used. Which brings up the question how would he be sending off Kill Aura logs if he was using a bow?
Wrong, blatant lie
Match Link - https://www.badlion.net/match/kitpvp/3068172
Opponent's Sword Durability 249/251
Pippiter's Sword Durability 248/251
Opponent's Arrows - 32/32
Pippiter's Arrows - 29/32
Opponent's Iron Helmet Durability - 162/166
Pippiter's Iron Helmet Durability - 164/166
Based off of helmet durability, since there is no protection they are absolute. That means Pippiter was hit twice by his opponent, and his opponent was hit 4 times by Pippiter. The opponent's sword durability is down by two and never used his bow, which means Pippiter's helmet durability should be down by two, which it is. Pippiter sword durability is down by 3, which means only 1 out of 3 of his arrows successfully hit his opponent ~ 166-3-1 = 162, the amount of durability left on his opponents helmet. Based on health values, they were clearly in a sword fight when pippiter was banned, which means Pippiter is blatantly lying about what he was doing while he's banned.
In his video, he said he speaked to Admins and Moderators about his logs and said he set them off for several minutes before his ban, which is false. He set them all off within 2 seconds of his ban. They were the ghost client checks. Also, about this ghost client check - another development team has figured out our ghost client check independently and has confirmed with us it is what we do. We told them it's exactly what we do, and they effectively said "I can see why you claim your ghost client check is 100% accurate if it bans, because this method is absolute." Soon there will be an outside source that confirms our ghost client check is accurate, publicly.
About GCheat not being 100%, it's not because of one specific check - Mass Packet Hacking. This check can false fire under very certain circumstances that is very blatantly obvious it's a false fire to a developer, and basically every automatic ban that we have ever claimed as false HAS BEEN THIS CHECK (DaGoldBrick in spectator mode, for example). This is not the check Pippiter set off. Basically nowadays, every other check, if it bans you, we claim is 100% except MPH, which we claim about 99%.
Pippiter will not be unbanned