Posted on 27 April 2015 - 02:33 AM
PandaBlack47 wrote
@NACHOOO_ They could do it for each separate ladder, and then have an overall for global.
Posted on 28 April 2015 - 03:47 AM
13thedude wrote
How about:
1300-1399 = Silver
1400-1499 = Gold Nova
1500-1599 = Master Guardian
1600-1699 = Legendary Eagle
1700-1799 = Legendary Eagle Master (LEM)
1800-1899 = Supreme Master First Class
1900-1999 = Global Elite
I still think that is too many groups.
My idea, without names b/c I can't think of any:
Global Rank — Players @ Rank — Player %
0000-1400 — 113492 — 68.42%
1401-1599 — 52387 — 31.58%
1600-1799 — 361 — 00.22%
1800-1999 — 37 — 00.02%
2000-9999 — 1 — ~00.00%
Also, I don't know how much of a fan I am of having global ranking be the rank determiner, but I don't think we have anything better.
Posted on 28 April 2015 - 06:11 AM
qazzy1122 wrote
13thedude wrote...
I still think that is too many groups.
My idea, without names b/c I can't think of any:
Global Rank — Players @ Rank — Player %
0000-1400 — 113492 — 68.42%
1401-1599 — 52387 — 31.58%
1600-1799 — 361 — 00.22%
1800-1999 — 37 — 00.02%
2000-9999 — 1 — ~00.00%
Also, I don't know how much of a fan I am of having global ranking be the rank determiner, but I don't think we have anything better.
This is why smelly said we don't have enough players, only 1 player will be the highest rank, and just look of the amount of people in 1600-2000 and the 0-1600
Posted on 28 April 2015 - 06:49 AM
Ofir____________ wrote
qazzy1122 wrote...
This is why smelly said we don't have enough players, only 1 player will be the highest rank, and just look of the amount of people in 1600-2000 and the 0-1600
That isn't how this works. More players does not mean more people in the top group, it probably means even higher % for the first 2 groups. I think we have enough players.
Posted on 28 April 2015 - 11:10 AM
Would it be Global or for each rank ?Posted on 28 April 2015 - 11:52 AM
No I like the elo system better!Posted on 28 April 2015 - 07:54 PM
Automatically Deleted