Posted on 06 May 2015 - 04:40 AM
If you're a non-donor like myself, you may find how annoying it is to have such as small limit to how many ranked matches you can play per day.To fix this, I propose:
Instead of having a maximum number of games you can play, why not incorporate the "ranked" part of ranked matches in a bit more? By this,I mean that instead of a maximum number of games to play, you can only lose a maximum number of times.
Here's how it will work:
Non Donor: 2 loses before not being able to play
Donator: 5 loses before not being able to play
Donator+: 9 loses before not being able to play
This way, it encourages practicing so you can play more games, as well as donating to play longer, similar to how it is now.
Also, this is my first post on the forums. Yippee!
Posted on 06 May 2015 - 04:51 AM
I'm going to think on this one.Posted on 06 May 2015 - 04:55 AM
No, that's like saying someone has to be good to play. Donator is advertised already as unlimited matches, so you're going to upset a huge portion of donators on the server. And then you have to consider that people are paying money to get the perks they were promised they'd have.Also, you can have 20 matches per day if you're registered on the forums as a non-donor, and you can be gifted matches by donator+ players.
Posted on 06 May 2015 - 01:18 PM
-1 to the donor part. We payed and there will be a ton of chargebacks and chargeback bans due to thisPosted on 06 May 2015 - 01:21 PM
-1 I bought donor for unlimited ranked matchesAnyway, non donors would probably get less matches from that, unless they can get at least 10 wins with no losses.
Posted on 06 May 2015 - 02:50 PM
Interesting idea, but we won't ever take away stuff from the people who paid for it.Posted on 06 May 2015 - 05:20 PM
20 matches is just enough for me and when voting works, it's 40 matches a day. If you want to play ranked always, donate to Badlion.Posted on 07 May 2015 - 03:03 AM
-1. You can't take away unlimited matches for donators, that's totally unfair since we payed money.Posted on 07 May 2015 - 04:07 AM
People would get a lot angrier at losses, and donors should never be linited